Flanders v. State
Decision Date | 10 October 1911 |
Docket Number | (No. 3,544.) |
Citation | 9 Ga.App. 820,72 S.E. 286 |
Parties | FLANDERS v. STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
(Syllabus by the Court.)
The act creating the city court of Bainbridge prescribes no special form for the accusation to be preferred in criminal cases in that court further than that the accusation shall be founded on an affidavit, and shall be signed by the prosecuting officer of the court
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Criminal Law, Dec. Dig. § 252.*]
The provisions of Pen. Code 1910, § 954, relate to the form of indictments or accusations preferred by grand juries, and not to accusations in city courts.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Criminal Law, Dec. Dig. § 252.*]
The accusation in the present case was sufficient as against motion to quash and motion in arrest of judgment.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 526-536; Dec. Dig. § 252.*]
Error from City Court of Bainbridge; W. M. Harrell, Judge.
John Flanders was convicted of crime, and brings error. Affirmed.
P. D. Rich, for plaintiff in error.
M. E.O'Neal, Sol., for the State.
POWELL, J. [1] 1. The accusation, attacked in the present case both by motion to quash made before the trial and by motion in arrest of judgment after the convic-
tion, is in the following form: The specific objection is that the accusation alleged that Nancy Flanders charges and accuses the defendant in the name and behalf of the citizens of Georgia when it should so read as to make M. E. O'Neal, the solicitor of the court, the accuser. The act creating the city court of Bainbridge (Acts 1900, p. 101) contains only the following provision on this subject: "That defendants in criminal cases in said city court of Bainbridge may be tried on written accusation founded on affidavit, which accusation shall be signed by the prosecuting officer of said court." The present accusation was founded on an affidavit, and was signed by the prosecuting officer of the court. It seems to be sufficient so far as the act creating the court is concerned.
2. Counsel for the plaintiff in error bases his contention as to the insufficiency of the accusation on the ground that Pen. Code 1910, § 954, prescribes the form for indictments and accusations. That section does prescribe a form for "every indictment or accusation of the grand jury." Under the form there prescribed the grand...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Brown v. State, 33089
...a substitute for the formal finding of the grand jury as to the misdemeanors triable in the city courts in question. Flanders v. State, 9 Ga.App. 820, 822, 72 S.E. 286; Brown v. State, 16 Ga.App. 268, 85 S.E. 262; Shealey v. State, supra; Curtis v. State, 48 Ga.App. 135, 136, 172 S.E. 99; B......
-
Young v. State
...is a necessary base for an accusation: Scroggins v. State, 55 Ga. 380 (1875); Smith v. State, 63 Ga. 168 (1) (1879); Flanders v. State, 9 Ga.App. 820 (1), 72 S.E. 286 (1911); Gilbert v. State, 17 Ga.App. 143, 86 S.E. 415 (1915); Chauncey v. State, 129 Ga.App. 207 (2), 199 S.E.2d 391 (1973);......