Foley v. Iowa Dept. of Transp., Motor Vehicle Div.

Decision Date13 February 1985
Docket NumberNo. 83-1620,83-1620
Citation362 N.W.2d 208
PartiesKenneth Paul FOLEY, Appellant, v. IOWA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION, Appellee.
CourtIowa Supreme Court

Ronald H. Schechtman, Carroll, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Atty. Gen., Robert P. Ewald, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lester A. Paff, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Considered by REYNOLDSON, C.J., and McGIVERIN, LARSON, SCHULTZ, and WOLLE, JJ.

McGIVERIN, Justice.

Petitioner Kenneth Paul Foley appeals from the district court's judgment on judicial review affirming an order and amended order of respondent Iowa department of transportation (DOT) revoking his driver's license for one year and denying his eligibility for a temporary restricted license (work permit) that would allow him to drive to and from (and in the course of) his job. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

On appeal, Foley contends (1) that, pursuant to Iowa Code section 321B.13 (1983), his license should have been revoked for only 180 days rather than one year, and (2) that DOT was without authority to deny him a work permit when its initial order in his case had declared him eligible for one and the time for further agency review of that order had passed with no review requested. We find against Foley on the first issue and for him on the second.

The relevant facts are not disputed. In 1979, Foley was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage (OMVUI) and refused to submit to chemical testing to determine his blood alcohol level, as provided in Iowa Code chapter 321B. As a result of petitioner's refusal to undergo testing, his driver's license was suspended for 45 days, although the statute in force at that time provided for revocation for a period of not less than 120 days nor more than one year as a consequence of refusal to undergo chemical testing. See Iowa Code § 321B.7 (1979). The 45-day revocation was the result of a bargain Foley made with a department of transportation hearing officer in which Foley waived his right to a formal hearing under section 321B.8 (1979) in exchange for a shorter revocation period than that provided in section 321B.7.

In 1982, petitioner was again arrested for OMVUI and again refused to undergo chemical testing. After receiving a sworn statement to that effect pursuant to 1982 Iowa Acts ch. 1167, § 20, now appearing as Iowa Code section 321B.13 (1983), the department of transportation revoked Foley's driver's license for one year. On March 23, 1983, after a hearing demanded by Foley, a department hearing officer entered an order sustaining the revocation and stating that petitioner could apply to the department for a work permit to allow him to do job-related driving.

The March 23 order provided that an appeal of the order could be taken to the director of motor vehicles within twenty days. See 820 Iowa Admin.Code [01, B] 3.9(1). During that time neither Foley nor the department appealed the order.

On April 4 Foley applied for a work permit, which was issued by the DOT on April 21.

On April 15 the hearing officer who had entered the March 23 order was notified that a person whose driver's license is revoked for refusal to undergo chemical testing is not eligible for a work permit. See 820 Iowa Admin.Code [07, C] 11.4(3)(c)(1). On April 29, the hearing officer entered an amended order reaffirming the revocation and stating that petitioner was not eligible for a work permit and revoking the one that had been issued to him.

Petitioner appealed the amended order to the director of motor vehicles, contending that the department was without authority to amend the March 23 order once the time for appeal of that order had passed. The director upheld the amended order.

Foley then sought judicial review, Iowa Code sections 321B.27 and 17A.19, of (1) the department's revocation of his driver's license for one year (as opposed to 180 days), and (2) the department's revocation of his work permit. The district court affirmed both of the department's acts. This appeal followed. Iowa Code § 17A.20.

We do not specifically address either of petitioner's assignments of error, because we believe that this case can and should be disposed of on the basis of jurisdictional issues which we may raise at any time. See Pierce v. Pierce, 287 N.W.2d 879, 881-82 (Iowa 1980).

We agree with petitioner that the department had no authority to issue the amended order of April 29. Under 820 Iowa Admin.Code [01, B] 3.9(1), the March 23 order became final when twenty days elapsed without petitioner or the department seeking further review of the order. In Franklin v. Iowa Department of Job Service, 277 N.W.2d 877 (Iowa 1979), we held that a similar deadline for seeking further agency review was mandatory, not merely directory. After that deadline had passed with no request for review, the agency was without jurisdiction to review its decision.

Once an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Askvig v. Snap-On Logistics Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • December 17, 2021
    ...for judicial review to the district court is a jurisdictional prerequisite for review of final agency action."); Foley v. Iowa Dep't of Transp. , 362 N.W.2d 208, 210 (Iowa 1985) ("Timely appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite for judicial review."); Ford Motor Co. v. Iowa Dep't of Transp. ......
  • Askvig v. Snap-On Logistics Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • December 17, 2021
    ...review to the district court is a jurisdictional prerequisite for review of final agency action."); Foley v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 362 N.W.2d 208, 210 (Iowa 1985) ("Timely appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite for judicial review."); Ford Motor Co. v. Iowa Dep't of Transp. Reguls. Bd., 2......
  • Askvig v. Snap-On Logistics Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • December 17, 2021
    ...... Appeal. from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeffrey D. ... law." Jacobs v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 887. N.W.2d 590, 593 (Iowa 2016) (quoting ... Foley v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 362 N.W.2d 208,. ... prerequisite for judicial review."); Ford Motor Co. v. Iowa Dep't of Transp. Reguls. Bd., ......
  • City of Des Moines v. City Development Bd.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • September 6, 2001
    ...prerequisite. Sioux City Brick & Tile Co. v. Employment Appeal Bd., 449 N.W.2d 634, 638 (Iowa 1989); Foley v. Iowa Dep't of Transp., 362 N.W.2d 208, 210 (Iowa 1985). If the district court in this case was without authority to hear the case because the petition for judicial review was untime......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT