Fonk v. Town of Yorkville, 332
| Decision Date | 27 October 1958 |
| Docket Number | No. 332,332 |
| Parties | Richard FONK and Amy Fonk, appellants, v. TOWN OF YORKVILLE |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Mr. Wm. J. P. Aberg, for appellants.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
To continue reading
Request your trial
11 cases
-
Rotter v. Coconino County
...262 A.2d 472, 476-77 (1970); Town of Yorkville v. Fonk, 3 Wis.2d 371, 88 N.W.2d 319, 322-23 (1958), appeal dismissed, 358 U.S. 58, 79 S.Ct. 110, 3 L.Ed.2d 48 (1958). In defense of his position, Rotter points out that the Arizona statute, which allows one hundred percent expansion, is much m......
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Wkrs. U., Local 473 v. McElroy
-
Rotter v. Coconino County
...Vt. at 319-20, 262 A.2d at 476-77; Town of Yorkville v. Fonk, 3 Wis.2d 371, 378, 88 N.W.2d 319, 323, appeal dismissed, 358 U.S. 58, 79 S.Ct. 110, 3 L.Ed.2d 48 (1958); see also Annotation, Zoning: Changes, Repairs, or Replacements in Continuation of Nonconforming Use, 87 A.L.R.2d. 4 (1963); ......
-
Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. City of Tomah
...10 Wis.2d at page 432, 103 N.W.2d 17.6 Town of Yorkville v. Fonk (1958), 3 Wis.2d 371, 375, 88 N.W.2d 319, appeal dismissed 358 U.S. 58, 79 S.Ct. 110, 3 L.Ed.2d 48.7 South Carolina State Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros., supra, footnote 2.8 Fire Protection Handbook (12th ed.), sec. 7--35.9 Id. ......
Request a trial to view additional results