Foremost Ins. Co. v. Warmuth, 93-3721
| Citation | 649 So.2d 939 |
| Decision Date | 15 February 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 93-3721,93-3721 |
| Parties | 20 Fla. L. Weekly D429 FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Charles WARMUTH and Rita Warmuth, Appellees. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Lisa D. Harpring of Moss, Henderson, Vangaasbeck, Blanton & Koval, P.A., Vero Beach, for appellant.
Stephanie S. Collison of William S. Frates, II, P.A., Vero Beach, for appellees.
Appellant, Foremost Insurance Company, defendant below (Foremost), appeals an order assessing taxable costs. The issue involved in this case is whether taxable costs can be assessed against an uninsured motorist carrier in excess of the stated policy limits. We conclude that taxable costs may be assessed above and beyond the uninsured motorist policy limits and therefore affirm the trial court's award of costs.
This case emanates from an automobile accident involving an uninsured motorist. A police officer, driving a town of Indian Shores' police cruiser, engaged in a high speed pursuit of Eric Gieszelmann, the uninsured motorist. The high speed chase led to a collision with Charles Warmuth's vehicle thereby causing Warmuth serious bodily injury. Foremost was Warmuth's uninsured motorist carrier with coverage limits of $200,000.
Thereafter, the Warmuths sued the town of Indian Shores and Foremost with the jury returning a verdict apportioning ninety-nine percent of the negligence of the accident to Indian Shores and one percent of the negligence to Gieszelmann. After the Warmuths accepted a remittitur, the trial court entered an amended final judgment in favor of the Warmuths against Foremost in the amount of $200,000. Subsequently, Foremost tendered its policy limits of $200,000 subject to a right of contribution.
After entry of the amended final judgment, the Warmuths moved to tax costs against Foremost. The germane portion of Foremost's uninsured motorist policy is silent on the issue of taxable costs and reads as follows A. [T]he maximum limit of our liability for Uninsured Motorist Coverage in any one accident is the sum of the Uninsured Motorists Coverage limits in the Declarations applicable to each vehicle. [$200,000].
Ultimately, the trial court granted the motion to tax costs against Foremost in the full amount of $28,458.48. Thus, we now consider the propriety of the trial court's actions assessing costs against Foremost.
Uninsured motorist coverage was statutorily created to provide the reciprocal or mutual equivalent of the automobile liability coverage found in the Financial Responsibility Law, section 324.011 et seq., Florida Statutes (1993). Mullis v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 252 So.2d 229 (Fla.1971); Dewberry v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 363 So.2d 1077 (Fla.1978). Accordingly, with regard to uninsured motorist coverage, it is the public policy of Florida that every insured is entitled to recover for the damages he or she would have been able to recover if the offending motorist had maintained a policy of liability insurance. Mullis, 252 So.2d at 234; see also Carguillo v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 529 So.2d 276 (Fla.1988). As such, section 627.727, Florida Statutes (1993), allows the insured the same recovery which would have been available to him or her had the tortfeasor been insured to the same extent as the uninsured motorist coverage. Dewberry, supra; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Morales, 533 So.2d 952 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Therefore, the uninsured motorist carrier should be considered the tortfeasor's liability insurer with policy limits as set forth in the uninsured motorist policy.
In the liability insurance context, the general rule is that the insurer is liable for interest and costs which exceed the stated policy limits.
However, liability...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Diaz-Hernandez v. State Farm Fire and Cas.
...been injured by a tortfeasor with insufficient or no insurance.") (citing § 627.727(1), Fla. Stat. (2002)); Foremost Ins. Co. v. Warmuth, 649 So.2d 939, 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) ("[W]ith regard to uninsured motorist coverage, it is the public policy of Florida that every insured is entitled ......
-
Armstrong v. Allstate Ins. Co.
...by the legislature for the benefit of injured persons, and not for the benefit of insurance companies. See Foremost Ins. Co. v. Warmuth, 649 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). See also Brown v. Progressive Mut. Ins. Co., 249 So.2d 429 (Fla.1971). In Foremost, the Fourth District cited Mullis v.......
-
Graber v. CLARENDON NAT. INS. CO.
...provide coverage for interest and costs, which exceed policy limits, unless specifically excluded by the policy. Foremost Ins. Co. v. Warmuth, 649 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). So let us turn to the policy language at Clarendon's policy states that the most that [it] will pay is ... Each C......
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Marotta
...resources, as the issue raised will likely have to be addressed in any subsequent trial. As suggested in Foremost Insurance Co. v. Warmuth, 649 So.2d 939, 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), the possibility that an uninsured motorist claimant's recovery could be consumed entirely by costs could serve ......