Forrest v. Wilson, 1D04-0125.
| Citation | 889 So.2d 124 |
| Decision Date | 30 November 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. 1D04-0125.,1D04-0125. |
| Parties | Ryan FORREST, Appellant, v. Katherine S. WILSON, Individually and on behalf of Minors, etc., Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
William Mallory Kent, Esq. of The Law Office of William Mallory Kent, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
Katherine S. Wilson, pro se, for Appellee.
Because the trial court's finding that appellant stalked and harassed appellee's minor child by repeatedly engaging in certain acts is not supported by competent, substantial evidence, the permanent injunction against repeat violence is REVERSED. See § 784.048(2), Fla. Stat. (2003) (); see also McMath v. Biernacki, 776 So.2d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
().
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Santiago v. Towle, 5D05-151.
...against repeat violence, each purported act of violence must be founded upon competent, substantial evidence. Forrest v. Wilson, 889 So.2d 124 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). In the present case while there may arguably exist some evidence of one incident of violence against Ms. Towle, there does not ......
-
Terrell v. Thompson
...Competent, substantial evidence must support the trial court's findings of two incidents of repeat violence. See Forrest v. Wilson, 889 So.2d 124, 124-25 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). We reverse the judgment entering the injunction in the present case because competent, substantial evidence does not......