Foskey v. Bank of Alapaha

Decision Date16 October 1978
Docket NumberNo. 56313,56313
Citation249 S.E.2d 346,147 Ga.App. 541
PartiesFOSKEY v. BANK OF ALAPAHA
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Elsie Higgs Griner, Nashville, J. Laddie Boatright, Hazlehurst, for appellant.

Yancey, Perkins & Barnick, Carson Dane Perkins, Nashville, Sumner & Mitchell, Douglas W. Mitchell, III, Douglas, for appellee.

QUILLIAN, Presiding Judge.

The instant appeal was taken from an order following a hearing pursuant to Code Ann. § 67-705 (Ga.L.1974, pp. 398, 401). The trial judge ordered certain past due amounts to be paid into court as well as other amounts as they became due. Held:

Subsection (d) of Code Ann. § 67-705 provides: "If the defendant shall fail to comply with any provisions of Section 67-705 to the detriment of plaintiff, the court shall issue a writ of possession. Issuance of said writ of possession shall not affect the merits of said case but shall only affect the right to possession pending a final decision on the merits." Citing that authority, in Dein v. Citizens Jewelry, 145 Ga.App. 118, 243 S.E.2d 286, this court held that an order entered pursuant to Code Ann. § 67-705 was not final and thus a direct appeal from such order would not lie. The recent Supreme Court case of Sumner v. Adel Banking Co., 241 Ga. 563, 246 S.E.2d 680, points out that whether a judgment is appealable must be determined by Code Ann. § 6-701(a) (APA; Ga.L.1965, p. 18, as amended through Ga.L.1975, pp. 757, 758) and Code Ann. § 81A-154(b) (CPA; Ga.L.1966, pp. 609, 658; 1976, pp. 1047, 1049). The judgment here was not dispositive of the case and therefore lacks finality as required by those Code sections. Since the judgment was not final and there was no compliance with the interlocutory appeal provision of Code Ann. § 6-701(a) 2, the appeal is subject to dismissal.

For the benefit of the parties, however, we point out at an evidentiary hearing under Code Ann. § 67-705 the trial judge only determines the "amounts actually to become due." "As to amounts past due no procedure for a hearing is provided. Thus, as we construe the Act no evidence of past due amounts should be considered and the trial judge should only determine whether there are allegations of defenses or claims which would offset amounts alleged past due." Candler I-20 Properties v. Inn Keepers Supply Co., 137 Ga.App. 94, 97, 222 S.E.2d 881, 884. Accord, Jordan v. Farmers &c. Bank of South Carolina, 138 Ga.App. 43, 44, 225 S.E.2d 498; Coppage v. MellonBank, 142 Ga.App. 12(2), 234 S.E.2d 824 (disapproved on other grounds, Sumner v. Adel Banking Co., supra). The defendant is only required to pay into the registry of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Camp v. Coweta County
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • 21 Enero 2005
    ...Ga.App. 204, 205(2), 444 S.E.2d 136 (1994); Cherry v. Hersch, 193 Ga.App. 471, 472(1), 388 S.E.2d 64 (1989); Foskey v. Bank of Alapaha, 147 Ga.App. 541, 249 S.E.2d 346 (1978). Therefore, this Court is without jurisdiction to consider Camp's appeal of the grant of the county defendants' moti......
  • Brown v. Associates Financial Services Corp.
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • 15 Julio 1985
    ...... C. & S. Nat. Bank v. Rayle, 246 Ga. 727, 729-730, 273 S.E.2d 139 (1980). OCGA § 5-6-35 was amended, effective July ... See also Smalls v. Harrison, 150 Ga.App. 473, 474, 258 S.E.2d 227 (1979); Foskey v. Bank of Alapaha, . Page 894. 147 Ga.App. 541, 249 S.E.2d 346 (1978). I would reverse the ......
  • O'Kelly v. International Business Machines Corp., 61739
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • 12 Mayo 1981
    ...is not reviewable at this point in time. See Jordan v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 147 Ga.App. 515, 516, 249 S.E.2d 327; Foskey v. Bank of Alapaha, 147 Ga.App. 541, 249 S.E.2d 346; Smalls v. Harrison, 150 Ga.App. 473, 474, 258 S.E.2d 227. Compare King Orthopedic Appliances v. Medical Funding Svc......
  • Cavender v. First Nat. Bank of Brunswick, s. 69295
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • 5 Marzo 1985
    ...[OCGA § 44-14-234(4) ]. There being no certificate[s] of immediate review the instant [appeals are] premature. Foskey v. Bank of Alapaha, 147 Ga.App. 541 (249 SE2d 346) [(1978)]; Sumner v. Adel Banking Co., 241 Ga. 563 (246 SE2d 680) [(1978)]." Id., 150 Ga.App. at 474, 258 S.E.2d 227. In th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT