Fox v. State
| Decision Date | 28 January 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 31817,31817 |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
| Parties | James Paschal FOX v. The STATE. |
James P. Fox, pro se.
Oehlert, Kermish, Labovitz, Marcus & Brazier, Stephen A. Kermish, Atlanta, for appellant.
Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Dean R. Davis, Asst. Dist. Atty., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Daryl A. Robinson, Staff Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.
Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appeals, contending the evidence did not support the verdict.
1. The victim, David Willis, was found dead of a gunshot wound to the chest. The State's evidence showed that appellant had argued with Willis in the latter's apartment prior to the killing. Appellant then left and returned with a pistol, whereupon several shots were fired. He then returned to his own residence where, according to several witnesses, he announced that he had just killed a man. He returned once again to the scene of the shooting after police had arrived and was arrested on the advice of certain neighbors of the deceased. A pistol taken from his pocket pursuant to the arrest was identified by a ballistics expert as the murder weapon. Although he denied any knowledge of the shooting at the time of his arrest, appellant testified at trial that he had shot Willis in self-defense.
Appellant urges that no evidence was introduced to show malice or to rebuthis testimony that he had shot in self-defense. "If a homicide is proved, and the evidence adduced to establish it shows neither mitigation nor justification, malice will be presumed from the proof of the homicide; but the presumption is rebuttable, and may be overcome by evidence of alleviation or justification." Boyd v. State, 136 Ga. 340, 71 S.E. 416 (1911); Miller v. State, 184 Ga. 336, 338, 191 S.E. 115 (1937); Graham v. State, 234 Ga. 520, 521, 216 S.E.2d 817 (1975). The State's evidence, which indicates no element of mitigation or justification whatsoever, was sufficient to establish malice beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury evidently chose to disbelieve appellant's testimony that he had acted in self-defense, as was its prerogative. See Thompson v. State, 204 Ga. 407(4), 50 S.E.2d 74 (1948); Clenney v. State, 229 Ga. 561(2), 192 S.E.2d 907 (1972); Young v. State, 232 Ga. 176, 205 S.E.2d 307 (1974). There was no error in refusing to set aside the verdict as not being supported by the evidence.
2. Appellant assigns as error the trial court's failure to give his requested charge on the defense of justification, contending that the court's charge on this issue was unconstitutionally burden-shifting. The court's charge was as follows: "Now, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, where the defense of justification is offered, it is the duty of the jury to consider it along with all the testimony in the case, and if the evidence, taken as a whole, raises a reasonable doubt in the mind of the jury of the defendant's guilt, you should...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bruce v. Smith
...Williams v. State, 257 Ga. 186, 187, 356 S.E.2d 872 (1987); Walden v. State, 251 Ga. 505, 507, 307 S.E.2d 474 (1983); Fox v. State, 238 Ga. 387, 233 S.E.2d 341 (1977); Lofton, 237 Ga. at 276, 227 S.E.2d 327. 12. See Griffin v. State, 267 Ga. 586, 586-587, 481 S.E.2d 223 (1997); Anderson v. ......
-
Hanvey v. State, 75135
...covers the same principles, is not grounds for reversal. Young v. State, 226 Ga. 553(3) (176 SE2d 52) (1970); Fox v. State, 238 Ga. 387(2) (233 SE2d 341) (1977)." Kelly v. State, 241 Ga. 190, 191(4), 243 S.E.2d Enumerations of error 10 and 13 complain of the failure to give requested charge......
-
Jefferson v. State
...requested instruction is not reversible error where the charge given substantially covers the same principles of law. Fox v. State, 238 Ga. 387(2), 233 S.E.2d 341 (1977). Enumeration 2 is without 6. The trial court did not err by refusing to exclude the testimony of a state's witness for hi......
-
Thompson v. State, s. 59468
...as a defense. The trial court gave a full and fair charge on this defense which was in no way burden shifting. Fox v. State, 238 Ga. 387, 388(2), 233 S.E.2d 341 (1977). Arguments that this otherwise proper charge became burden shifting upon the trial court's refusal to give appellants' requ......
-
Criminal Law - Franklin J. Hogue and Laura D. Hogue
...(internal quotation marks omitted). 75. Id., 647 S.E.2d at 263. 76. Id. 77. Id. at 212-13, 647 S.E.2d at 263 (citing Fox v. State, 238 Ga. 387, 388, 233 S.E.2d 341, 342 (1977)). 78. Id. at 213, 647 S.E.2d at 263. 79. Id. 80. Id. 81. Id. 82. Id. at 214, 647 S.E.2d at 264. 83. Id. at 215, 647......