Friend v. Friend
| Decision Date | 11 February 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. 3D03-1714.,3D03-1714. |
| Citation | 866 So.2d 116 |
| Parties | Richard E. FRIEND, Appellant, v. Marsha Lynne FRIEND, et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Kluger, Peretz, Kaplan & Berlin and Steve L. Silverman, Miami, for appellant.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and Robert M. Brochin and Erik W. Scharf, Miami, for appellees.
Before GERSTEN, GREEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.
Richard E. Friend appeals from an order unsealing his dissolution of marriage case at the request of Orion Group. We affirm.
On November 12, 1997, pursuant to an agreement between Friend and his former wife, Marsha Lynne Friend, the trial court ordered the file of their dissolution of marriage action sealed. Approximately five years later, Friend was sued in connection with legal services he provided to a group of companies involved in the development of resort properties. Orion Group, one of said companies, requested permission to intervene in and unseal the dissolution of marriage action on April 2, 2003 alleging possible discrepancies in representations made by Friend in the two cases.
Friend opposes the unsealing of the dissolution file on several grounds. After careful consideration and review of appellant's position, we find none of the arguments sufficient to overcome the well established right of public access to court proceedings and records. See, e.g., Art. I, § 24, Fla. Const.; § 119.07, Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.035; Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc., 531 So.2d 113 (Fla.1988). In Barron, the court recognized the trial court's inherent power to control the conduct of its own procedures by closing all or parts of the proceedings but only in limited circumstances under specific guidelines. 531 So.2d at 118. Once a record is sealed, there is a presumption that it was correctly sealed; however, a party moving to unseal the record may overcome the presumption by demonstrating that the original order sealing the record was legally in error. Scott v. Nelson, 697 So.2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). In the instant case, it is evident that the trial court sealed the dissolution action based solely on the parties' agreement. The denial of access to dissolution of marriage proceedings may not be based solely upon the wishes of the parties to the litigation. As the Barron court stated "parties seeking a dissolution of marriage are not entitled to a private proceeding." 531 So.2d at 119. Therefore, we affirm the trial court's ruling below...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. Limbaugh
...court has jurisdiction to entertain a motion for public access to judicial records even if the case is closed. In Friend v. Friend, 866 So.2d 116, 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), this court allowed exactly the same procedure that The Post is requesting in the present case. In Friend, this court aff......
-
Rocket Grp., LLC v. Jatib
...Ltd., –––So.3d ––––, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D739, 2009 WL 928484, *1 & *2 n. * (Fla. 3d DCA Apr.8, 2009) (quoting Friend v. Friend, 866 So.2d 116, 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)); Barron v. Fla. Freedom Newspapers, Inc., 531 So.2d 113, 118–19 (Fla.1988). And even if a court allows confidential documents......
- Verysell-Holding LLC v. Tsukanov, 3D03-2490.
-
BDO Seidman, LLP v. Banco Espirito Santo Int'l, Ltd.
...parties do not object. Denial of access “may not be based solely upon the wishes of the parties to the litigation.” Friend v. Friend, 866 So.2d 116, 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). ...
-
Pleadings and mandatory electronic filing
...of correctness and the movant seeking to vacate such an order bears the burden of showing the order is unsound. [ Friend v. Friend , 866 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (where dissolution of marriage file had been sealed solely on basis of agreement of parties, court did not err in unsealing ......
-
Florida family law rules of procedure
...record may overcome the presumption by demonstrating that the original order sealing the record was legally erroneous. Friend v. Friend , 866 So.2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Lifecare International, Inc. v. Barad Documents filed in a pending civil action, which contained no confidential inform......
-
Alternatives to physical and testimonial proof
...marriage action solely based upon the party’s agreement is not a legitimate basis, and the presumption was rebutted. Friend v. Friend , 866 So.2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). 9.3.2 Marriage Factors creating presumption of marriage. All presumptions necessary to make a marriage valid, including t......
-
Privileges
...the trial court sealed the dissolution action based solely on the parties’ agreement, the file cannot remain sealed. Friend v. Friend , 866 So.2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Sonderling v. Sonderling The trial court did not err in sealing financial aspects pleadings and a settlement agreement, n......