Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. McMurray
Citation | 173 S.W. 929 |
Decision Date | 12 December 1914 |
Docket Number | (No. 8061.) |
Parties | FT. WORTH & R. G. RY. CO. v. McMURRAY. |
Court | Court of Appeals of Texas |
Action by Mrs. Nellie McMurray against the Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Reversed and rendered.
Marshall Ferguson, of Stephenville, for plaintiff in error. Chandler & Pannill, of Stephenville, and R. F. Milam, of Ft. Worth, for defendant in error.
In the town of Dublin, the roadbed of the Ft. Worth & Rio Grande Railway was so constructed as to leave a ditch at the outer edge of the right of way and near the railway station, into which ditch water drained from a leaky water tank maintained by the company, and from land contiguous to the right of way. For lack of sufficient outlet, the water accumulating in the ditch formed a pool, estimated by different witnesses to be from 1 foot to 5 or 6 feet in width, from 3 feet to 60 feet in length and a few inches in depth; the size of the pool varying with the rainfall, but never going entirely dry. The railway company also maintained a toilet upon its right of way within a few feet of the pool, the refuse from which was washed into the pool. Water accumulating in the pool, under the circumstances recited, became stagnant and especially offensive by reason of the drainage from the toilet and mosquitoes in great numbers bred therein, to the annoyance of citizens living in that immediate vicinity. A. J. McMurray with his family resided on a lot contiguous to the pool and his dwelling was situated at a distance therefrom, estimated by different witnesses to be from 30 feet to 60 feet. During the first portion of February, 1912, Mr. McMurray became ill, and his illness continued until his death, which occurred April 30, 1912. This suit was instituted by his widow and children against the railway company for damages sustained by them by reason of his death which plaintiffs alleged was caused by the negligence of defendant in so constructing its roadbed as to cause the formation of said ditch; in permitting water to escape from its water tank and accumulate in the ditch; and in maintaining the toilet at the place noted. Upon the cause of action so alleged, plaintiffs recovered a judgment for $3,500, from which the defendant has prosecuted this writ of error.
Several physicians testified upon the trial, including the family physician, who attended the deceased from the inception of his illness up to about two weeks prior to his death, at which time he was carried from his home in Dublin to a hospital in Ft. Worth, where a surgical operation was performed upon him shortly before his death. That operation disclosed, beyond controversy, that the deceased was afflicted with abscess of the liver, by reason of which a great quantity of pus had accumulated around the liver and in the plural cavity of one side of the body; and the physicians testifying all agreed that the immediate cause of death was abscess of liver so discovered.
Dr. E. D. Winters, witness for plaintiff, the physician who first treated the deceased, testified:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hayhurst v. Boyd Hospital
... ... Green, ... 273 Pa. 353, 117 A. 79; Mayor etc. of Nashville v ... Reese, 138 Tenn. 471, 197 S.W. 492, L. R. A. 1918B, 349; ... Fort Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. McMurray (Tex. Civ ... App.), 173 S.W. 929; Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R ... Co. v. Perkins, Admr., 177 Ky. 88, 197 S.W ... ...
-
Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Wisdom
...C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis, 161 S. W. 932, writ denied; S. L. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. West, 174 S. W. 287, writ denied; Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. McMurray, 173 S. W. 929, writ denied; Medlin Milling Co. v. Mims, 173 S. W. 968, writ denied; H. & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Schmidt, 61 Tex. We conclude t......
-
McVeigh v. International Travelers Assur. Co.
...31 S.W.(2d) 337; Richards v. H. K. Mulford Co. (C.C.A.) 236 F. 677; Copeland v. Hines (C.C.A.) 269 F. 361; Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. McMurray (Tex.Civ.App.) 173 S.W. 929. It will serve no useful purpose to extend my views on the controlling question, and, without further discussion of th......
-
Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Preslar
...The argument is convincing, the position apparently logical and supported to some extent by the decision in Fort Worth & Rio Grande Ry. Co. v. McMurray (Tex. Civ. App.) 173 S. W. 929, but the exact question was decided adversely to appellant's claim in the case of Texas Employers' Ins. Co. ......