Furr v. State, 84-613

Decision Date08 March 1985
Docket NumberNo. 84-613,84-613
Citation464 So.2d 693,10 Fla. L. Weekly 602
Parties10 Fla. L. Weekly 602 Nicholas Vance FURR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John T. Kilcrease, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ann Garrison Paschall, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

DANAHY, Judge.

Appellant was indicted for first degree (felony) murder (Count 1) and armed robbery (Count 2). Following a jury trial, he was convicted as charged and sentenced to consecutive terms of life imprisonment without parole for twenty-five years as to Count 1 and fifty years imprisonment as to Count 2. The trial court subsequently denied appellant's motion for new trial but granted his motion to correct sentence and vacated the judgment and sentence as to Count 2, the underlying felony. We reverse.

Appellant first contends that the trial judge erred by failing to make inquiry following his statement, first given when he appeared before the court for sentencing, that he had been denied his right to testify. We find this contention to be without merit. Cutter v. State, 460 So.2d 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

Appellant's second contention is that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on second degree (depraved mind) murder. We agree. In a prosecution for first degree murder the trial court must instruct on the offense charged and on all offenses that are lesser in degree if there is evidence in the record to support a finding of guilt for that offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.490. Obviously, second degree (depraved mind) murder is an offense lesser in degree than first degree (felony) murder under section 782.04, Florida Statutes (1983). In the case before us the evidence adduced at trial demonstrated that appellant entered the apartment with a loaded rifle and, while inside, sprayed shots around a room in which several people known to him were located. One of the shots struck the victim. Under these facts, the jury, if so instructed, could have exercised its inherent power of pardon and found appellant guilty of "an act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life," i.e., that appellant's actions fit the statutory definition of second degree (depraved mind) murder provided in section 782.04(2), Florida Statutes (1983).

Consequently, we conclude that the evidence in the case before us warrants submission of an instruction permitting the jury to find appellant guilty of second degree (depraved mind) murder, the degree of offense immediately less than the degree of conviction. Because such an instruction was requested and mandated by rule 3.490, the trial court's failure to give the instruction is reversible and not harmless error. Therefore, appellant is entitled to a new trial on first degree (felony) murder. Linehan v. State, 442 So.2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). See State v. Abreau, 363 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1978); Johnson v. State, 423 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Hunter v. State, 389 So.2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

On retrial for first degree (felony) murder, the conviction for armed robbery (the underlying felony) shall be...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Scruggs
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 15, 1990
  • Scurry v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • February 11, 1988
    ...necessarily lesser included offense and was not applicable under the circumstances of this case, citing its decision in Furr v. State, 464 So.2d 693 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). In Linehan v. State, 476 So.2d 1262 (Fla.1985), this Court determined that "second-degree murder is a necessarily included......
  • Scurry v. State, 85-1934
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 27, 1987
    ...without consideration of evidence to support it. The supreme court considered and approved this court's holding in Furr v. State, 464 So.2d 693 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), that second degree depraved mind murder is a lesser included offense of first degree murder and that a requested instruction on......
  • State v. Furr
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 17, 1986
    ...Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, for respondent. PER CURIAM. This cause is before us on a petition to review Furr v. State, 464 So.2d 693 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), in which the district court held (1) that second-degree depraved mind murder is a lesser included offense of first-degree fe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT