Gabriel v. Board of Regents of University of Colorado, 11951.
Decision Date | 30 April 1928 |
Docket Number | 11951. |
Citation | 83 Colo. 582,267 P. 407 |
Parties | GABRIEL v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Error to District Court, Boulder County; Robert G. Smith, Judge.
Suit by Clifford W. Mills against the Board of Regents of the University of Colorado, under the Declaratory Judgments Act to determine the validity of a contract, wherein John H Gabriel was substituted as plaintiff. Demurrer to complaint was sustained, and judgment entered against plaintiff for costs, and plaintiff brings error.
Affirmed.
Gabriel, Mills & Mills, of Denver, for plaintiff in error.
William L. Boatright, Atty Gen., Charles Roach, Deputy Atty. Gen and John C. Vivian, and Jean S. Breitenstein, Asst. Attys. Gen., for defendant in error.
There parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court and we hereinafter refer to them as plaintiff and defendant.
This suit was brought by Clifford W. Mills under our Declaratory Judgments Act, to determine the validity of a contract. Defendant demurred to the complaint on the grounds of insufficient facts and want of jurisdiction. The demurrer was sustained, and judgment entered against the plaintiff for costs. To review that judgment he prosecutes this writ.
The contract in question reads as follows:
'It is further mutually understood and agreed that the said trustee shall raise for the purpose of erecting said dormitories, a sum of six hundred thousand and no/100 ($600,000.00) dollars net, at a cost not to exceed 7 per cnet. of the principal amount of six hundred thousand and no/100 ($600,000.00) dollars, said cost of procuring the said funds to include all charges for sale of securities, legal expenses and trustee's fees; and
'It is expressly understood and agreed that the trustee shall receive no remuneration for the conduct of the said dormitories or any part thereof, except as herein specifically provided.
'In witness whereof the parties of the first part have caused these presents to be signed by its president and attested by its secretary, and the party of the second part has hereunto set his hand and seal this 13th day of October, A. D. 1926.
The complaint alleges 'that there is a question of the validity of said contract, in that it may be contended that the University has no authority to lease its property' that the 'contract may be in violation of sections 1, 3, and 5, art. 11, of the Constitution of the state of Colorado'; that 'the board of regents of the University of Colorado may not have...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
American Federation of Labor v. Reilly, 15446.
... ... No. 15446. Supreme Court of Colorado December 21, 1944 ... Rehearing ... Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 315 ... U.S. 437, 62 S.Ct. 706, 86 L.Ed. 946; ... tritely expressed in our opinion in Gabriel v. Board of ... Regents, 83 Colo. 582, 587, 267 ... ...
-
Moore v. Moore
... ... facts": State ex rel. Miller v. State Board of ... Education (1935), 56 Idaho 210, 52 P.2d 141. The Supreme ... Court of Colorado said: "This Act was not intended to ... repeal ... Gabriel v. Board of Regents (1928), 83 Colo. 582, ... ...
-
Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S. v. Hemenover
... ... Gabriel v. Board of Regents, 83 Colo. 582, 267 P ... ...
-
Montgomery v. City and County of Denver, 14324.
... ... No. 14324. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. May 31, 1938 ... Error ... Clayton Trust Commission and the ... board of trustees of the Firemen's Pension Fund, the ... said in Gabriel v. Board of Regents, 83 Colo. 582, ... 267 P ... ...