Gardner v. Blackston, 75880
| Citation | 365 S.E.2d 545,185 Ga.App. 754 |
| Decision Date | 08 February 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 75880,75880 |
| Parties | GARDNER v. BLACKSTON et al. |
| Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
James S. Owens, Jr., George R. Neuhauser, Atlanta, for appellant.
Harold T. Daniel, Jr., Atlanta, Burke B. Johnson, Danielsville, for appellees.
Appellant Gardner was driving at night on a Cobb County highway when a tractor-trailer truck pulling a low-boy trailer carrying a heavy road-grader made a left turn from a side road across his path. Gardner testified that he never saw any lights on the trailer and that, therefore, thinking the truck had cleared his lane, he did not apply his brakes. He hit the trailer with such force that the road-grader was knocked off. He sustained extensive injuries, and his automobile was severely damaged. There was testimony that he had been travelling at a high rate of speed.
The investigating officer testified at trial that the truck driver had initially stated that the lights on the trailer were "shorted out" but had subsequently stated, while still at the accident scene, that he had meant the lights were shorted by the impact, and not that they had been out of order while he was driving. He acknowledged that one of his corner "marker" lights had not been working. The trial court granted appellees' motion for partial directed verdict, thereby removing from the jury's consideration the issues of punitive damages, attorney fees, and costs, as well as that of "spoliation" of, or tampering with, the evidence regarding whether the trailer lights went out before or after the collision. Appellant received $81,660 as compensatory damages, but no punitive damages. He appeals, enumerating as error the trial court's granting appellees' motion for partial summary judgment with regard to the spoliation charge, and the court's refusal to submit to the jury either the full or the redacted version of the accident report. Held:
1. Our scrutiny of the record reveals no error with respect to the first enumeration. Neither does Georgia law recognize spoliation of evidence as a separate tort, nor is there any indication here that the evidence was despoiled, or tampered with. See generally, OCGA Title 51. This enumeration has no merit.
2. Likewise, we find no error in the trial court's declining to send the accident reports out with the jury. The investigating officer, as well as others, was fully examined at trial regarding the substance of the reports, and the trial court may well...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Trevino v. Ortega
...La Raia v. Superior Court, 150 Ariz. 118, 722 P.2d 286, 289 (1986) (existence of adequate remedies); Gardner v. Blackston, 185 Ga.App. 754, 365 S.E.2d 545, 546 (1988) (no spoliation tort under Georgia law); Boyd v. Travelers Ins. Co., 166 Ill.2d 188, 209 Ill.Dec. 727, 652 N.E.2d 267, 270 (1......
-
Rizzuto v. Davidson Ladders, Inc.
...Ltd., 722 A.2d 1247, 1249-50 (Del.Super.1998); Martino v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 908 So.2d 342, 347 (Fla.2005); Gardner v. Blackston, 185 Ga. App. 754, 755, 365 S.E.2d 545 (1988); Gribben v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 824 N.E.2d 349, 355 (Ind.2005); Meyn v. State, 594 N.W.2d 31, 33-34 (Iowa 199......
-
Willard v. Caterpillar, Inc., F019296
...N.E.2d 1037, 1038; Hirsch v. Several courts have refused to recognize the spoliation tort for policy reasons. (Gardner v. Blackston (1988) 185 Ga.App. 754, 365 S.E.2d 545, 546; Weigl v. Quincy Specialties Co. (1993) 158 Misc.2d 753, 601 N.Y.S.2d 774, 776; Baugher v. Gates Rubber Co., Inc. (......
-
In re Avado Brands, Inc.
...of Georgia juris prudence in the area of considering whether to adopt the tort of spoilation of evidence: In Gardner v. Blackston, 185 Ga.App. 754, 755(1), 365 S.E.2d 545 (1988) (physical precedent only), we stated in dicta that Georgia law does not recognize spoliation of evidence as a sep......