Garner v. Garner

Decision Date11 February 1969
Citation297 N.Y.S.2d 463,59 Misc.2d 29
PartiesSylvia GARNER, Plaintiff, v. William GARNER, Defendant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court
MEMORANDUM

CARMINE A. VENTIERA, Justice.

The plaintiff-wife has instituted an action for divorce on the ground that her husband, the defendant, has been confined in prison for a period of three or more consecutive years after their marriage (Domestic Relations Law sec. 170, subd. (3)). Defendant, a convicted felon, is presently serving a sentence of 15 to 20 years in Clinton Prison for robbery, and has served more than three (3) consecutive years of said sentence. There has been mailed to the court, by the defendant, an affidavit entitled 'Opposition to an Action for a Divorce.' The court will consider the affidavit as an answer to the complaint and a counterclaim for divorce. The affidavit requests the assignment of counsel to represent him in the divorce action; that he be permitted to be present at the proceedings; to appoint a doctor to examine plaintiff to determine if she is pregnant. The plaintiff's papers in opposition ask the court to strike defendant's counterclaim and deny the defendant's motion to be present at the proceeding.

It has been held that a prisoner has the right to defend a civil suit brought against him while he is in jail (Avery v. Everett, 110 N.Y. 317, 18 N.E. 148, 1 L.R.A. 264; Bowles v. Habermann, 95 N.Y. 246; Matter of Weber's Estate, 165 Misc. 815, 1 N.Y.S.2d 809). Defendant-husband, accordingly, has the legal right of appearing through counsel in defense of the action. Should the court assign counsel to the imprisoned defendant? It has been held that the court has inherent power apart from statute to assign counsel for defense of an indigent person charged with a crime (People v. Price, 262 N.Y. 410, 187 N.E. 298). The court upon motion brought may grant permission for a defendant to proceed as a poor person in a civil proceeding (CPLR 1101), and has discretion to assign an attorney upon granting such leave (CPLR 1102(a)). Lacking a factual showing here that defendant is a poor person, the court will not assign counsel. However, defendant can communicate with any of the following organizations who may provide him with legal counsel:

Brooklyn Bar Association

123 Remsen Street, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11201

Community Action for Legal Services, Inc.

80 William Street, New York, N.Y. 10038

Brooklyn Legal Services Corporation

503 Pennsylvania Avenue, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11207.

Should the defendant be present at the proceedings? The counterclaim is a cause of action by the defendant against the plaintiff (CPLR 3019(a)). The Civil Rights Law section 79, 'suspends, during the term of the sentence, all the civil rights * * * of, or held by, the person sentenced * * *.' (See also CPLR 208) This defendant is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Michael N. v. Montgomery Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 23 Septiembre 2022
    ...from seeking relief in court (see,Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Assn., 239 App.Div. 253, 267 N.Y.S. 719 ; Garner v. Garner, 59 Misc. 2d 29, 297 N.Y.S.2d 463 ; CPLR 1201 ; but see, Civil Rights Law § 79[2] ; § 79–a[2] [removing disqualification of felony prisoners to sue in court]). Ad......
  • Johnstown Water Bd. v. City of Johnstown
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 26 Abril 2021
    ...from seeking relief in court (see,Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Assn., 239 App.Div. 253, 267 N.Y.S. 719 ; Garner v. Garner, 59 Misc 2d 29, 297 N.Y.S.2d 463 ; CPLR 1201 ; but see, Civil Rights Law § 79[2] ; § 79—a[2] [removing disqualification of felony prisoners to sue in court]). Add......
  • Community Bd. 7 of Borough of Manhattan v. Schaffer
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 16 Junio 1994
    ...from seeking relief in court (see, Kittinger v. Churchill Evangelistic Assn., 239 App.Div. 253, 267 N.Y.S. 719; Garner v. Garner, 59 Misc.2d 29, 297 N.Y.S.2d 463; CPLR 1201; but see, Civil Rights Law § 79[2]; § 79-a[2] [removing disqualification of felony prisoners to sue in court]. Additio......
  • Anonymous, In re
    • United States
    • New York Surrogate Court
    • 23 Septiembre 1974
    ...in the last 100 years (Bowles v. Habermann, 95 N.Y. 246, 250; Avery v. Everett, 110 N.Y. 317, 333, 18 N.E. 148, 155; Garner v. Garner, 59 Misc.2d 29, 297 N.Y.S.2d 463; Matter of Anonymous, 67 Misc.2d 366, 323 N.Y.S.2d Civil Rights Law, § 79, subd. 1 clearly suspends all the civil rights of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT