Gehrmann v. State, 94-3023

Decision Date18 January 1995
Docket NumberNo. 94-3023,94-3023
Citation650 So.2d 1021
Parties20 Fla. L. Weekly D210 Keith GEHRMANN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

No response required for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This Petition for Writ of Certiorari is directed to the circuit court sitting in appellate capacity, which affirmed petitioner's conviction and sentence in the county court for driving under the influence of alcohol. The circuit court held that section 316.1934(5), Florida Statutes (1991) does not violate the confrontation clauses of the federal and Florida constitutions, nor does it impermissibly shift the burden of proof to the defense.

We deny certiorari, as the circuit court applied the correct law in reaching its decision.

GUNTHER, STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Betancourt v. State, 94-1095
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 18 Enero 1995
  • Belvin v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 8 Marzo 2006
    ...hearsay exception, pursuant to sections 316.1934(5) and 90.803(8), Florida Statutes, and based on our decisions in Gehrmann v. State, 650 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), and State v. Irizarry, 698 So.2d 912 (Fla. 4th DCA Petitioner counters that the circuit court's ruling on the breath test......
  • Belvin v. State, No. 4D04-4235 (FL 6/8/2005)
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 8 Junio 2005
    ...to sections 316.1934(5) and 90.803(8), Florida Statutes, and based on controlling precedent from our district. See Gehrmann v. State, 650 So. 2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (denying certiorari review of a circuit court appellate decision holding that section 316.1934(5) does not violate the co......
  • State v. Irizarry, 96-3234
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 3 Septiembre 1997
    ...without proof that the testing of the machine showed it to be accurate. STONE, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN, J., concur. 1 In Gehrmann v. State, 650 So.2d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 659 So.2d 1086 (Fla.1995) we denied certiorari review of a circuit court appellate decision holding that the s......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT