Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Merck

Decision Date16 July 1993
Docket NumberNo. A93A0696,A93A0696
Citation434 S.E.2d 585,209 Ga.App. 879
PartiesGEORGIA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MERCK.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Blasingame, Burch, Garrard & Bryant, Andrew J. Hill III, Milton F. Eisenberg II, Athens, for appellant.

Chambers, Mabry, McClelland & Brooks, Lawrence J. Hogan, C. Gregory Ragsdale, Atlanta, Gregory M. Perry, Commerce, for appellee.

COOPER, Judge.

Appellee sued Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company ("Georgia Farm") based on its denial of collision coverage after appellee's car was damaged in an accident. Georgia Farm denied coverage after concluding that the loss was the result of an accident in which the driver was charged with racing. The matter was tried before a jury which awarded appellee his property damage, bad faith penalties and attorney fees. This appeal followed.

The record reflects that appellee owned a 1988 Ford Mustang GT, which was fully insured with collision coverage by Georgia Farm. On the evening of November 25, 1989, the Mustang was involved in a one-car accident while being driven by appellee's nephew, Milton Andrew Campbell ("Campbell"). Campbell and Marcus Merck, appellee's son, were riding around in the vehicle when they decided to drive to a park where they met friends. After arriving at the park, two of Campbell's friends, Troy Wilburn and Scottie Whitfield, decided to engage in a car race. The group then proceeded to Water Works Road in Commerce, Georgia, where the race ensued. When Campbell arrived at the site, he parked the Mustang off to the side of the road and watched the others line up for the race. Though not connected with the race himself, Campbell at some point, after the race had begun, followed the vehicles that were involved. After the race concluded and as Whitfield's pickup truck was re-entering the right lane, Campbell drove up behind the truck and attempted to pass the vehicle. However, Campbell hit unidentified matter on the side of the road and wrecked the Mustang. Following the wreck, Trooper Sullivan arrived on the scene to investigate the accident. Upon conducting a physical investigation of the accident scene and interviewing persons on the scene, Trooper Sullivan determined that there was no physical evidence that uncovered any causes for the accident; that Campbell was travelling at a speed greater that the posted speed limit of 55 mph; and that only two vehicles were involved in the race, that of Wilburn and Whitfield. However, the officer cited Campbell for driving under the influence and racing, to which Campbell pled not guilty.

On the first business day following the accident, appellee reported the accident to Georgia Farm. Georgia Farm's claims adjuster, Doug Oliver, received the loss notice and police report on December 1, 1989 and proceeded to interview Campbell and appellee. Campbell denied that the Mustang was involved in a race on the night in question; however, Oliver got the impression that Campbell was not candid. Oliver interviewed the officer and learned of Campbell's traffic citations, and on January 19, 1990, Georgia Farm denied appellee's claim based on a racing exclusion in the policy but opted to make full payment of the car's outstanding balance to the bank/lienholder.

1. In its first two enumerations of error, Georgia Farm contends the trial court erred in granting appellee's motion in limine preventing the introduction at trial of the racing citation issued to Campbell, Trooper Sullivan's testimony about the racing citation, Sullivan's expert...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Hunter v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. of Japan, A97A1389
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • December 5, 1997
    ...by excluding relevant evidence, which is not inadmissible for some reason of prejudice or illegality. See Ga. Farm, etc., Ins. Co. v. Merck, 209 Ga.App. 879, 880(1), 434 S.E.2d 585, and 2. Hunter contends the trial court erred in denying her motion to exclude the testimony of Jeff Worth, a ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT