GEORGIA HIGHWAY EXPRESS COMPANY v. DO-ALL CHEMICAL COMPANY, 43776.
| Decision Date | 02 December 1968 |
| Docket Number | 43776. |
| Parties | GEORGIA HIGHWAY EXPRESS COMPANY v. DO-ALL CHEMICAL COMPANY et al. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Vandiver, Barwick & Bentley, M. Cook Barwick, John E. Talmadge, Ellis & Ellis, George R. Ellis, Jr., for appellant.
Smith, Crisp & Hargrove, William E. Smith, San S. Harben, Jr., for appellees.
To the plaintiff appellant's declaration in attachment, no answer was filed within the time allowed by law and the trial court entered an order declaring the defendants to be in default. However, the trial court subsequently granted a motion by defendant Do-All Chemical Company to open the default. It is from the latter order that the plaintiff appeals enumerating it as error. A certificate for immediate review of the ruling was executed by the trial court in accordance with the Appellate Practice Act. See Ga. L. 1965, p. 18, Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073.
The requirements for opening a defaulted case are set forth in Code Ann. § 81A-155 (b) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 659; Ga. L. 1967, pp. 226, 238). This section requires that any showing to open a default "shall be made under oath, shall set up a meritorious defense, shall offer to plead instanter, and announce ready to proceed with the trial."
The defendant's motion to vacate states only that "defendant has a good and meritorious defense to the declaration." No facts regarding the defense are set forth, only this conclusion. All the facts set forth relate to certain events which transpired and which form the ground upon which the motion to vacate is based, i.e., excusable neglect. Thus a condition precedent to opening the default was not met and the trial judge had no discretion in the matter. See Johnson v. Dockery, 222 Ga. 569 (150 SE2d 921); Blanch v. King, 202 Ga. 779 (44 SE2d 779); Pryor v. American Trust &c. Co., 15 Ga. App. 822 (2) (84 SE 312).
It was error to open the default.
Judgment reversed. Felton, C. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Drug Emporium, Inc. v. Peaks, A97A0710
...Indus., 155 Ga.App. 147, 270 S.E.2d 337; B-X Corp. v. Fulton Plumbing Co., 140 Ga.App. 131, 230 S.E.2d 331; Ga. Hwy. Express Co. v. Do-All Chem. Co., 118 Ga.App. 736, 165 S.E.2d 429. The role of the appellate court in reviewing a grant or denial of a motion to open default is the determinat......
-
American Liberty Ins. Co. v. Sanders
...Under the italicized portion, it has been held that facts, and not merely conclusions, must be stated. Georgia Highway Express Co. v. Do-All Chemical Co., 118 Ga.App. 736, 165 S.E.2d 429. This is so that the court can determine whether, if the default were opened and movant were allowed to ......
-
Rapid Taxi Co. v. Broughton
...should be invoked only in extreme situations.") (punctuation omitted) (physical precedent only). 11. See Ga. Hwy. Express Co. v. Do-All Chem. Co., 118 Ga.App. 736, 165 S.E.2d 429 (1968); Coleman v. Dairy land Ins. Co., 130 Ga.App. 228, 229-230, 202 S.E.2d 698 12. Patel v. Gupta, 234 Ga.App.......
-
Ford v. Saint Francis Hosp., Inc.
...v. Dairyland Ins. Co., 130 Ga.App. 228, 229, 202 S.E.2d 698 (1973). The latter is a mere conclusion. Ga. Hwy. Express Co. v. Do-All Chemical Co., 118 Ga.App. 736, 737, 165 S.E.2d 429 (1968). The verified answer was accompanied by the affidavit of the hospital's Director of Infection Control......