Gilbert v. State
| Decision Date | 24 March 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 49464,49464 |
| Citation | 344 So.2d 564 |
| Parties | Ulysses Ulice GILBERT, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for petitioner.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
By petition for certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District (Gilbert v. State, 329 So.2d 339) which allegedly conflicts with a decision of this Court (State v. White, 324 So.2d 630) on the same point of law. Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.
Petitioner was found guilty of aggravated assault. Upon appeal, his conviction was affirmed on the authority of Battle v. State, 292 So.2d 594 (Fla.2d DCA 1974); Nelson v. State, 157 So.2d 96 (Fla.3d DCA 1963); and McGullers v. State, 206 So.2d 30 (Fla.4th DCA 1968). These cases all stand for the rule of law, that a well-founded fear of violence or imminent peril on the part of the victim is not an element of the statutory offense of aggravated assault. In State v. White, supra, this Court held that the victim's well-founded fear that violence is imminent is an element of the statutory offense of aggravated assault, and disapproved the holdings to the contrary in Battle v. State, supra, McCullers v. State, supra, and Nelson v. State, supra. We have jurisdiction.
The decision of the District Court is quashed and the cause is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of State v. White, supra.
It is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Kelly v. State
-
Gilbert v. State, 75-971
...Gen., for appellee. Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ. NATHAN, Judge. As mandated by the Florida Supreme Court in Gilbert v. State, 344 So.2d 564 (Fla.1977), this cause is before us for further consideration in light of State v. White, 324 So.2d 630 (Fla.1975). We have reviewed the ca......
-
S.P.M. v. State , 2D10–2415.
...the element of a well-founded fear when the victim does not testify regarding his or her subjective state of mind. Gilbert v. State, 344 So.2d 564 (Fla.1977) ( Gilbert I ), appears to be the progenitor of this practice. In less than 250 words, the supreme court did no more than quash a Thir......