McCullers v. State, 1165
| Decision Date | 17 January 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 1165,1165 |
| Citation | 206 So.2d 30 |
| Parties | George McCULLERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Charles A. Sullivan, of Sullivan & Burch, Vero Beach, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Charles W. Musgrove and James T. Carlisle, Asst. Attys. Gen., Vero Beach, for appellee.
The defendant-appellant, George McCullers, by information, was charged with the offense of manslaughter by culpable negligence, tried by a jury, found guilty of aggravated assault and adjudged guilty by the court with imposition of sentence. It is from this judgment and sentence defendant now appeals.
The pertinent part of the information charges
'* * * that GEORGE McCULLERS, on the 27th day of June, one thousand nine hundred and sixty-six in the County of Indian River and State of Florida, did then and there unlawfully and by culpable negligence, in driving an automobile, but without intent to murder, kill BILLIE MARIE JENKINS in said county by causing his said automobile to collide with another automobile, in which said other automobile the said BILLIE MARIE JENKINS was then and there sitting and driving; contrary to the form of Statute in such case made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State of Florida.'
In charging the jury the trial judge, over objection of the defendant, gave an instruction that the offense of aggravated assault was a lesser included offense of the crime of manslaughter by culpable negligence. On appeal defendant contends as his primary attack that the offense of aggravated assault is not a lesser included offense of the crime of manslaughter by culpable negligence.
Our approach to this question necessitates the examination of the procedure contemplated by our Florida Statutes in such cases. It also involves the need for a workable definition of what would be considered 'a lesser included offense.' Chapter 919 of the Florida Statutes 1965, F.S.A. entitled 'Conduct of Jury' contains a section which is of critical import to the instant situation. 1
This section of the Florida Statutes is unambiguous and conveys clearly its meaning. It is a mandatory direction to give instructions to the jury on all offenses which are necessarily included in the offense charged.
The question now arises as to what is 'a lesser included offense' within the meaning of Section 919.16, F.S.1965, F.S.A. The test for a determination that an offense is 'a lesser included offense' is that if all the elements of a separate offense are present with others in an offense charged in an information or indictment, such separate offense is a lesser included offense; or, where all the elements of an offense are included among the elements of a charged offense, the former is a lesser included offense.
To determine the matter before us we must compare Section 782.07, F.S. 1965, F.S.A. 2 and Section 784.04, F.S.1965, F.S.A., 3 and then by a process of inclusion and exclusion determine those elements common and those not common, and if the greater offense includes all the legal and factual elements it may be safely said that the greater includes the lesser; if, however, the lesser offense requires the inclusion of some necessary element or elements in order to cover the completed offense not so included in the greater offense, then it may be safely said that the lesser is not necessarily included in the greater.
Our statute defining manslaughter is of ancient origin. However, after the advent of the motor vehicle, this statute became applicable to those cases where the death of a human being was caused by culpable negligence of the operator of the vehicle. Earlier cases dealing with the crime took the view that intent was not an essential element of the statutory offense of manslaughter when committed by culpable negligence. Kent v. State, 1907, 53 Fla. 51, 43 So. 773. In later cases it has been held that in statutory manslaughter the element of criminal intent ordinarily requisite to a crime has been supplanted by the statutory element of culpable negligence. Pitts v. State, 1938, 132 Fla. 812, 182 So. 234; Hulst v. State, 1936, 123 Fla. 315, 166 So. 828.
'Culpable negligence' as used in the manslaughter statute means negligence of a gross and flagrant character evincing a reckless disregard of human life or the safety of persons exposed to its dangerous effects, or that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of indifference to consequences; or which shows such wantonness or recklessness, or a grossly careless disregard of the safety and welfare of the public, or that reckless indifference to the rights of others which is equivalent to an Intentional violation of them. Carraway v. Revell, Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d 71; Cannon v. State, 1926, 91 Fla. 214, 107 So. 360.
The case law of our state that has been developed by the courts distinguishes between the offense of an assault and the offense of a battery. Goswick v. State, Fla.1962, 143 So.2d 817. The definition of assault as a tort and assault as a crime is quite different. We find the tort of assault defined as any intentional unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or force unlawfully directed toward the person of another under such circumstances as to create a well founded fear of imminent peril coupled with the apparent present ability to effectuate the attempt if not prevented. Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. Archer, 1936, 126 Fla. 308, 171 So. 214. The Florida Supreme Court has defined the crime of assault as an intentional attempt by violence to do injury to the person of another. Bailey v. State, 1918, 76 Fla. 230, 79 So. 639.
The bulk of jurisdictions define criminal assault as an apparent attempt to inflict a battery, or bodily contact, or harm upon another. 1 Wharton, Criminal Law, § 329, and cases cited therein.
A criminal assault may be made upon a person even though he had no knowledge of the fact at the time. Perkins Criminal Law, 88--89 (1957), see cases cited at n. 62. It should be noted that herein lies the distinction between assault as a crime and assault as a tort. If the intended victim is unaware of the attempt, he has suffered no harm and is not entitled to compensation for the tort committed against him. Restatement, Torts 2d, § 22. However, a criminal assault is an offense against the peace and dignity of the state as well as an invasion of private rights.
At common law there were no degrees of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Neider
...E.g., State v. Branch, 108 Ariz. 351, 498 P.2d 218 (1972); State v. Brown, 173 Conn. 254, 377 A.2d 268 (1977); McCullers v. State, 206 So.2d 30 (Fla.App.1968); Cook v. State, 258 Ind. 667, 284 N.E.2d 81 (1972); State v. Carmichael, 405 A.2d 732 (Me.1979); People v. Simpson, 5 Mich.App. 479,......
-
Rodriguez v. State
...98 Fla. 370, 123 So. 735 (1929); Anthony v. State, 246 So.2d 600 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 249 So.2d 441 (Fla.1971); McCullers v. State, 206 So.2d 30 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 210 So.2d 868 (Fla.1968). But see Kelly v. State, 78 Fla. 636, 83 So. 506 (1919) (finding defendant guilty o......
-
State v. Daggett
...v. State, 258 Ind. 667, 671-72, 284 N.E.2d 81, 84 (1972). See also, State v. Branch, 108 Ariz. 351, 498 P.2d 218 (1972); McCullers v. State, 206 So.2d 30 (Fla.App.1968). We summarized this test in syllabus point 7 of State v. Bailey, W.Va., 220 S.E.2d 432, (1975) where we said: "An offense ......
-
State v. Louk
...v. State, 258 Ind. 667, 671-72, 284 N.E.2d 81, 84 (1972). See also, State v. Branch, 108 Ariz. 351, 498 P.2d 218 (1972); McCullers v. State, 206 So.2d 30 (Fla.App.1968). We summarized this test in syllabus point 7 of State v. Bailey, W.Va., 220 S.E.2d 432 (1975) where we said: 'An offense i......
-
Physical torts
...of the attempt, he has suffered no harm and is not entitled to compensation for the tort committed against him. McCullers v. State , 206 So.2d 30, 33 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), overruled on other grounds by State v. White , 324 So.2d 630 (Fla. 1975). 7. Words Alone: Spoken words do not constitute......