Global Federal Credit Union v. Walker
Citation | 679 So.2d 1075 |
Parties | GLOBAL FEDERAL CREDIT UNION v. Dayle WALKER, d/b/a Bud's Truck and Auto Repair, and S.J. Suttles, d/b/a "SS" Auto Sales. 2940776. |
Decision Date | 02 February 1996 |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
J. Brian Slaughter, Tammy L. Frazier and Patrick W. Richardson of Bell Richardson, P.A., Huntsville, for Appellant.
Elizabeth J. Hubertz and Pamela L. Sumners, Birmingham, for S.J. Suttles.
On August 2, 1994, Global Federal Credit Union filed a complaint in the Madison County Circuit Court against Dayle Walker, d/b/a Bud's Truck and Auto Repair, and S.J. Suttles, d/b/a "SS" Auto Sales. Global alleged that on September 14, 1990, it had entered into a purchase money security agreement with Ronnie E. Patrick for the purchase of a 1990 Plymouth Laser automobile (Plymouth); that the Plymouth had been titled in Texas; and that the Texas title documents showed Global as the first lienholder. Global also alleged that in July 1993 Patrick was in Huntsville, Alabama; that the Plymouth became disabled and was towed to Walker's repair shop; that Patrick never returned to pick up the Plymouth; and that Walker made repairs to the Plymouth totalling $572.35. Global further alleged that in September and October 1993 Walker published a notice in the Huntsville News that the Plymouth was to be sold on November 6, 1993, pursuant to the Abandoned Motor Vehicles Act, § 32-13-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975, and that, without complying with the notice requirements of § 32-13-4(a), Ala.Code 1975, Walker converted the Plymouth by selling it to Suttles on November 6, 1993.
On September 8, 1994, Suttles answered Global's complaint and asserted that he was an innocent purchaser for value, that his possession of the Plymouth was lawful, and that his possession could not constitute conversion. On October 3, 1994, Suttles filed a cross-claim against Walker, seeking indemnification and asserting claims of negligence, breach of warranty, and fraud. On February 6, 1995, Walker answered Suttles's cross-claim.
The trial court tried the case without a jury; the parties stipulated, in writing, to certain facts and presented the testimony of three witnesses. The parties stipulated to the following facts:
On April 19, 1995, the trial court entered a judgment, stating, in pertinent part:
The trial court also taxed costs against Global.
Global appeals, contending that Walker converted the Plymouth because, it says, Walker failed to comply with § 32-13-4(a), Ala.Code 1975, by not giving Global written notice at least 30 days before the November 6, 1993, auction of the Plymouth. Global also contends that Suttles converted the Plymouth when he purchased it at auction from Walker.
Gray v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co., 623 So.2d 1156, 1160 (Ala.1993).
An abandoned motor vehicle is defined in § 32-13-1(1) and (2), Ala.Code 1975. Section 32-13-1(1), Ala.Code 1975, states that an abandoned motor vehicle, is:
"[a vehicle] which has been left by the owner, or some person acting for the owner, with an automobile dealer, repairman, or wrecker service for repair ... and has not been called for by [the] owner ... within a period of 60 days after the time agreed upon ... or within 60 days after the completion of necessary repairs."
Section 32-13-3 provides, in pertinent part:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Anderson
...with regard to the [AAMVA] have limited the protected class of persons to those with secured interests. Global Federal Credit Union [v. Walker, 679 So.2d 1075 (Ala.Civ.App.1996)]. Based on the foregoing, the trial court did not err in granting [the Smiths'] motion for summary judgment as to......
-
Gildersleeve v. Towing
...proper notice under the AMVA to the owner before selling the machinery at auction. The owner cites Global Federal Credit Union v. Walker, 679 So.2d 1075, 1078 (Ala.Civ.App.1996), as standing for the proposition that a holder of a motor vehicle under the AMVA has a duty to query out-of-state......
-
Anderson v. SMITH'S TOWING CO., INC.
...Abandoned Motor Vehicles Act directly affects a secured party or lienholder's property interests, see Global Federal Credit Union v. Walker, 679 So.2d 1075, 1078 (Ala.Civ.App. 1996), we have not previously held that a future titleholder's interest or an heir's interest is directly affected ......
-
Gildersleeve v. Towing
...proper notice under the AMVA to the owner before selling the machinery at auction. The owner cites Global Federal Credit Union v. Walker, 679 So. 2d 1075, 1078 (Ala. Civ. App. 1996), as standing for the proposition that a holder of a motor vehicle under the AMVA has a duty to query out-of-s......