Gomez v. Gomez

Decision Date13 May 1982
Parties, 437 N.E.2d 272 In the Matter of Neftali GOMEZ, Appellant, v. Blanca R.F. GOMEZ, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Barbara J. Simon, Mineola, for appellant.

Andrew Yankwitt, Lake Success, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM

Order, 86 A.D.2d 594, 446 N.Y.S.2d 127 affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division, to which we add, in view of petitioner's argument that jurisdiction has now been acquired by reason of the infant's presence in New York during the pendency of this proceeding, that our courts having been without jurisdiction when the proceeding was begun, the sojourn of the child in New York as a result of orders made without jurisdiction cannot result in the acquisition of jurisdiction.

COOKE, C. J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Bagot v. Ashcroft
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • February 11, 2005
    ...... Gomez v. Gomez, 86 A.D.2d 594, 595, 446 N.Y.S.2d 127 (N.Y.App.Div.), aff'd, 56 N.Y.2d 746, 452 N.Y.S.2d 13, 437 N.E.2d 272 (1982). . 13. Although it ......
  • Fogal v. Steinfeld
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • October 24, 1994
    ...... Page 881 . 450 N.E.2d 247 (1983); Lacks v. Lacks, 41 N.Y.2d 71, 74-75, 390 N.Y.S.2d 875, 359 N.E.2d 384 (1976); Gomez v. Gomez, 86 A.D.2d 594, 446 N.Y.S.2d 127 (2d Dept, 1982), aff'd 56 N.Y.2d 746, 452 N.Y.S.2d 13, 437 N.E.2d 272]. The court now examines the merit ......
  • Berger v. Medtronic, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • January 19, 1995
    ......59 N.Y.2d 739, 463 N.Y.S.2d 441, 450 N.E.2d 247; Lacks v. Lacks, 41 N.Y.2d 71, 390 N.Y.S.2d 875, 359 N.E.2d 384; Gomez v. Gomez, 86 A.D.2d 594, 446 N.Y.S.2d 127; affd. 56 N.Y.2d 746, 452 N.Y.S.2d 13, 437 N.E.2d 272.).         At issue is the preemptive effect ......
  • Nemes v. Tutino
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • April 26, 2019
    ...A.D.3d 1225, 1226 n., 51 N.Y.S.3d 675 [3d Dept. 2017] ; see Gomez v. Gomez, 86 A.D.2d 594, 595, 446 N.Y.S.2d 127 [2d Dept. 1982], affd 56 N.Y.2d 746, 452 N.Y.S.2d 13, 437 N.E.2d 272 [1982] ).4 The fact that the child has now lived in New York for several years is irrelevant to our jurisdict......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT