Gorod v. Tabachnick
| Decision Date | 17 July 1998 |
| Parties | Gertrude Davis GOROD & another 1 v. Edith TABACHNICK. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Fred Davis, pro se.
Gertrude Davis Gorod, pro se.
Joseph S. Provanzano, Peabody, for defendants.
RESCRIPT.
The petitioners, Fred Davis and Gertrude Davis Gorod, appeal from a judgment of a single justice of this court denying, without a hearing, their requests for relief under G.L. c. 211, § 3. We affirm. 2
In seeking relief under G.L. c. 211, § 3, it was the petitioners' burden to create a record--not merely to allege but to demonstrate, i.e., to provide copies of the lower court docket entries and any relevant pleadings, motions, orders, recordings, transcripts, or other parts of the lower court record necessary to substantiate their allegations--showing both a substantial claim of violation of a substantive right and that the violation could not have been remedied in the normal course of a trial and appeal or by other available means. Matthews v. D'Arcy, 425 Mass. 1021, 1022, 681 N.E.2d 815 (1997). Sinai v. Plymouth Div. of the Probate & Family Court Dep't, 425 Mass. 1021, 681 N.E.2d 278 (1997). Hines v. Commonwealth, 425 Mass. 1013, 1013, 680 N.E.2d 1172 (1997). Barnoski v. Commonwealth, 413 Mass. 1007, 603 N.E.2d 915 (1992). Allen v. Christian, 408 Mass. 1007, 1008, 563 N.E.2d 234 (1990). The petitioners did not create such a record, and so the single justice correctly denied their petition. It is of no consequence that the petitioners were acting pro se.
With the hope that it will eliminate confusion in the future, we take this opportunity to reiterate what we have said in other cases concerning clerks of court or registers (or a member of their staff) who refuse to accept for filing a notice of appeal tendered by a litigant. Clerks and registers, whether elected or appointed, are ministerial officers of the court when it comes to receiving and filing papers. See Donahue v. Secretary of the Commonwealth, 403 Mass. 363, 368-369, 530 N.E.2d 792 (1988). In the absence of an order from a judge, they may not refuse to accept a notice of appeal, even if they believe that no appeal is available or that the notice is untimely or otherwise defective. Morales v. Commonwealth, 424 Mass. 1010, 1011, 675 N.E.2d 769 (1997). Callahan v. Commonwealth, 416 Mass. 1010, 1010-1011, 625 N.E.2d 547 (1994). Burnham v. Clerk of the First Dist. Court of Essex, 352 Mass. 466, 467-468, 226 N.E.2d 190 (1967).
Of course not every filing of a notice of appeal requires the assembly of a record. If a dispute arises as to whether the record must be assembled in a given case, the litigant who seeks to appeal may move for an order compelling the assembly, and the matter must then be resolved by a judge. Where (as apparently happened here) a litigant seeks to appeal from an interlocutory order, and there is no right to an immediate appeal, no assembly of a record is required. That is a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Woods v. World Truck Transfer
...1999); Tenn. Code Ann. 18-5-102 (1994); see also Lewis v. Superior Court, 70 Cal. Rptr. 2d 598, 599 (Ct. App. 1998); Gorod v. Tabachnick, 696 N.E.2d 547, 548 (Mass. 1998); Stokes v. Aberdeen Ins. Co., 917 S.W.2d 267, 268 (Tex. 7 See Tenn. Code Ann. 18-1-105(a)(1); Tenn. Code Ann. 18-5-102(3......
-
Sabree v. Commonwealth
...notably absent, for example, is any indication of what materials were before the Appellate Division in 1974. See Gorod v. Tabachnick, 428 Mass. 1001, 1001, 696 N.E.2d 547, cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1003, 119 S.Ct. 514, 142 L.Ed.2d 426 (1998).Judgment affirmed.--------Notes:1 Also known as Gary......
-
Wells Fargo Bank v. Sutton
...that the notice is 10 untimely or otherwise defective." Loftfield v. Ferreira, 440 Mass. 1012, 1012 (2003), quoting Gorod v. Tabachnick, 428 Mass. 1001, 1001, cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1003 (1998). See Farzana K. v. Indiana Dep't of Educ., 473 F.3d 703, 708 (7th Cir. 2007) (clerk has limited "......
-
Commonwealth v. Hernandez
...all of the relevant pleadings, motions, and other parts of the trial court record pertaining to the disputed issue. Gorod v. Tabachnick, 428 Mass. 1001, 1001, 696 N.E.2d 547, cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1003, 119 S.Ct. 514, 142 L.Ed.2d 426 (1998). Nor did the Commonwealth provide a written trans......