Morales v. Com.
| Decision Date | 10 February 1997 |
| Citation | 424 Mass. 1010,675 N.E.2d 769 |
| Parties | Wilson MORALES v. COMMONWEALTH. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Wilson Morales, pro se, submitted a brief.
RESCRIPT.
In April, 1995, the petitioner, a Massachusetts inmate, filed a motion in the Superior Court seeking, free of charge, a copy of a transcript of a June, 1994, hearing at which he pleaded guilty and was sentenced. He made that request pursuant to G.L. c. 261, §§ 27A-27G, the statute governing court costs for indigent persons, and supported it with an affidavit of indigency and request for waiver as required by § 27B. A judge in the Superior Court denied the motion without a hearing (contra G.L. c. 261, § 27C and ) and without stating reasons.
General Laws c. 261, § 27D, provides that, "[u]pon being notified of the denial [of a request under the statute] the applicant shall also be advised of his right of appeal, and he shall have seven days thereafter to file a notice of appeal with the clerk or register." The petitioner alleges that he was never informed of his right to appeal, as § 27D requires. See Commonwealth v. Lockley, 381 Mass. 156, 160, 408 N.E.2d 834 (1980). He sent a notice of appeal to the Superior Court clerk's office more than a month after his motion had been denied, but it was not accepted for filing and was returned to him by the clerk's office for reasons that are not clear on this record.
In September, 1995, the petitioner filed a petition in the county court pursuant to G.L. c. 211, § 3, requesting either a reversal of the Superior Court's denial of his motion or, as an alternative, an order requiring the Superior Court clerk's office to accept for filing his notice of appeal. The single justice denied that petition without a hearing, from which the petitioner now appeals.
The single justice correctly denied the G.L. c. 211, § 3, petition since the petitioner had other means available by which to obtain the relief he sought. See Martineau v. Department of Correction, 423 Mass. 1007, 667 N.E.2d 1147 (1996); Maza v. Commonwealth, 423 Mass. 1006, 667 N.E.2d 1146 (1996); McGuinness v. Commonwealth, 420 Mass. 495, 497, 650 N.E.2d 780 (1995). He could have filed, and still may file, a motion in the Superior Court to compel the clerk of that court to accept for filing his notice of appeal and to process the appeal. Callahan v. Commonwealth, 416 Mass. 1010, 1010-1011, 625 N.E.2d 547 (1994). Burnham v. Clerk of the First Dist. Court of Essex, 352 Mass. 466,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gorod v. Tabachnick
...even if they believe that no appeal is available or that the notice is untimely or otherwise defective. Morales v. Commonwealth, 424 Mass. 1010, 1011, 675 N.E.2d 769 (1997). Callahan v. Commonwealth, 416 Mass. 1010, 1010-1011, 625 N.E.2d 547 (1994). Burnham v. Clerk of the First Dist. Court......
-
Jordan v. Superior Court
...too, was correctable with an appropriate motion. See Davis v. Tabachnick, 425 Mass. 1010, 680 N.E.2d 1171 (1997); Morales v. Commonwealth, 424 Mass. 1010, 675 N.E.2d 769 (1997). Moreover, we have never held, as Jordan seems to assume, that indigent defendants are automatically entitled to t......
-
Davis v. Tabachnick
...to compel the register of that court to accept for filing their notice of appeal and to process that appeal. See Morales v. Commonwealth, 424 Mass. 1010, 675 N.E.2d 769 (1997); Callahan v. Commonwealth, 416 Mass. 1010, 625 N.E.2d 547 (1994); Burnham v. Clerk of the First Dist. Court of Esse......
-
Lu v. Boston Div. of Housing Ct Dep't
...with appropriate motion in trial court). Cf. Davis v. Tabachnick, 425 Mass. 1010, cert. denied, 522 U.S. 982 (1997); Morales v. Commonwealth, 424 Mass. 1010 (1997). The single justice also correctly denied the request for an order vacating the execution in the summary process action. Withou......