Gosney v. Mccullers

Decision Date01 March 1932
Docket NumberNo. 110.,110.
Citation162 S.E. 746,202 N.C. 326
PartiesGOSNEY. v. McCULLERS et al.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Johnston County; Shaw, Emergency Judge.

Action by C. A. Gosney, trustee in bankruptcy for Charles W. Horne, against E. H. McCullers and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff assigns error.

Affirmed.

Civil action to determine plaintiff's alleged right to sell an undivided one-third interest in a tract of land in the possession of defendants.

The facts are these:

1. On December 5, 1910, Ashley Horne and wife, for a valuable consideration, executed a deed, with full covenants of warranty, conveying a house and lot in the town of Clayton to E. H. McCullers and wife, Nellie Horne McCullers, for life, remainder to their daughter, Melba McCullers, in fee.

2. The grantees immediately took possession of said house and lot and have continuously occupied the same as owners thereof, though their deed was not registered until August 17, 1929.

3. In the meantime, on October 22, 1913, Ashley Horne died intestate leaving him surviving his widow and three children, Chas. W. Horne, Nellie Horne McCullers, and Swannanoa Horne Priddy, as his only heirs at law.

4. None of the heirs of Ashley Horne have made any claim to the house and lot in question, nor is any now claiming an Interest therein, but all have recognized the defendants as the true owners thereof.

5. On May 31, 1927, Chas. W. Horne was adjudged a bankrupt by the District Court of the United States, and the plaintiff duly appointed trustee of his estate.

6. The plaintiff, as such trustee, brings this action alleging that, under the Bankruptcy Act (11 USCA) he is deemed to be vested with all the rights, remedies, and powers of a creditor of Chas. W. Horne (Lynch v. Johnson, 171 N. C. 611, 89 S. E. 61; Hinton v. Williams. 170 N. C. 115, 86 S. E. 994), and that in the exercise of said rights he is entitled to sell an undivided one-third interest in the locus in quo.

From a judgment for the defendants, rendered on the above facts agreed, the plaintiff appeals, assigning error.

Parker & Lee, of Smithfield, for appellant.

STACY, C. J.

Is an unregistered deed, admittedly good as between the parties, valid as against the trustee in bankruptcy of an heir of the grantor? We think it is.

An heir takes only the undevised inheritance of which the ancestor was seized at the time of his death. C. S. § 1654. And by the express terms of the Connor Act, chapter 147, Laws of 1885, now C. S. § 3309, only creditors of the donor, bargainor, or lessor, and purchasers for value, are protected against an unregistered conveyance of land, contract to convey, or lease of land for more than three years....

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Holt v. Holt
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 18 d3 Outubro d3 1950
    ...nothing except the undivised property left by the deceased parent. Chinnis v. Cobb, 210 N.C. 104, 185 S.E. 638; Gosney v. McCullers, 202 N.C. 326, 162 S.E. 746. In so far as his children are concerned, a parent has an absolute right to dispose of his property by gift or otherwise as he plea......
  • Jones v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, Inc.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 2 d3 Março d3 1932
  • Coggin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • 14 d1 Janeiro d1 1935
    ...the parties without registration, Leggett v. Bullock, 44 N. C. 283; McBrayer v. Harrill, 152 N. C. 712, 68 S. E. 204; Gosney v. McCullers, 202 N. C. 326, 162 S. E. 746, and, when registered, is good against creditors. A general creditor must yield to the lien of the mortgage from the moment......
  • Twitty v. Cochran
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 12 d3 Outubro d3 1938
    ... ... 631, 61 ... S.E. 604; Spence v. Pottery Co., 185 N.C. 218, 117 ... S.E. 32; Eaton v. Doub, 190 N.C. 14, 128 S.E. 494, ... 40 A.L.R. 273; Gosney v. McCullers, 202 N.C. 326, ... 162 S.E. 746. In the last cited case, Stacy, C.J., speaking ... for the court, says: "And by the express terms of ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT