Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Lang, 79-994
| Decision Date | 20 June 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-994,79-994 |
| Parties | GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Michael A. LANG, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Lewis F. Collins, Jr. of Dickinson, O'Riorden, Gibbons, Quale, Shields & Carlton, P.A., Sarasota, for appellant.
Michael R. Karp of Wood, Whitesell & Karp, Sarasota, for appellee.
Appellant issued a policy providing $50,000 in uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage to appellee. Appellee had an accident and elected to arbitrate his claim under the policy rather than pursue the tortfeasor, whose liability insurance limits were $15,000. The arbitration panel concluded that appellee sustained damages of $50,000 in the accident, for which he was 60% responsible, and accordingly awarded him $20,000. The panel rejected appellant's request for a $15,000 setoff in recognition of the tortfeasor's known liability insurance limits.
Appellee then filed suit against appellant to confirm the arbitration award. The circuit court rendered judgment on the pleadings in favor of appellee for $20,000 and awarded appellee his arbitration costs in the sum of $1,702.94. Appellant's request for a $15,000 setoff was again denied. We reverse.
The trial court erred in refusing to allow the setoff. Uninsured and underinsured motorist insurance provides coverage in excess of, but does not duplicate, benefits available to the insured from the tortfeasor. § 627.727(1), Fla.Stat.; Dickey v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co., 370 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
We can find no authority for appellee's contention that only benefits "actually received" by the insured can be applied as an offset against his uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. There is nothing in the statute or elsewhere suggesting that the word "available" in Section 627.727(1) was not used intentionally. We believe that a tortfeasor's liability insurance coverage is "available" to one injured at the hands of the former, even though proceedings have not yet been instituted against the tortfeasor. The tenor of appellee's argument to the contrary suggests that he may have misconstrued certain language in the cases holding that one insured against injury by an underinsured tortfeasor may look to his carrier for payment without first pursuing his claim against the tortfeasor, e. g., Arrieta v. Volkswagen Insurance Co., 343 So.2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). That principle, however, has no bearing on the issue addressed here. The issue here concerns not the right of recovery from the insurer, but rather the amount of recovery. We do note dicta in Arrieta approving the result we reach here. 343 So.2d at 921. 1
Appellee's reliance on Great American Insurance Co. v. Pappas, 345 So.2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977) is misplaced. There, the insurer insisted on arbitration of Mrs. Pappas' claim under its $300,000 UMC, and gave unequivocal notice that it would neither participate in her proceedings against the tortfeasor nor be bound by any verdict she might obtain therein. The arbitration panel awarded Mrs. Pappas $216,000, less the tortfeasor's $100,000 liability insurance coverage. Later, Mrs. Pappas obtained a verdict for $80,000 in her action against the tortfeasor. Her insurer refused to pay the arbitration award on the ground that the jury evaluation of her damages would be paid in full by the tortfeasor's liability carrier. Mrs. Pappas then sued her insurer and obtained judgment for the full amount of the arbitration award. That judgment was affirmed on appeal because the award had vested when it became final. The insurer had...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bruno v. Travelers Ins. Co., 79-1620
...arbitrators were less than the limits of the GEICO policy, which were thus potentially "available" to him. Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Lang, 387 So.2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Arrieta v. Volkswagen Ins. Co., supra, 343 So.2d at 921 (dictum). It is all the more certain that he is entitle......
-
Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Meade
...287 So.2d 665 (Fla. 1973); Netherlands Ins. Co. v. Moore, 190 So.2d 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966).7 See also Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Lang, 387 So.2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).8 § 682.11, Fla. Stat. (1979).9 Rutkin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 195 So.2d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA), aff'd, 199 So......
-
Freeman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 96CA0825
...equal to the at-fault party's liability limits. Weinstein v. American Mutual Insurance Co., supra; Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Lang, 387 So.2d 976 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1980). In contrast, in Colorado, an insured is entitled to the difference between the amount received in a good faith......
-
Cartwright v. Allstate Ins. Co., 83-612
...insurer, Allstate, a setoff against an arbitration award equal to the tortfeasor's liability coverage. Government Employees Insurance Company v. Lang, 387 So.2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Bruno v. Travelers Insurance Company, 386 So.2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Dickey v. Grange Mutual Casualty C......