Graham v. Culver
| Citation | 3 Wyo. 639,29 P. 270 |
| Parties | GRAHAM et ux. v. CULVER et al |
| Decision Date | 22 August 1892 |
| Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
(August 22, 1892.)
All the points raised in the petition for rehearing were thoroughly discussed by counsel and decided by this court on the original hearing. The title to and right of possession in the realty in controversy were directly in issue, and were adjudicated, in the former action of Culver v. Graham, (Wyo.) 3 Wyo. 211, 21 P. 694. [1] This suit is a persistent attempt, on various ingenious pretexts, to ignore that adjudication, and to relitigate the title to the property and the right of possession.
Motion for rehearing denied.
---------
Notes:
[1] Ante, 211.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Allen v. Lewis
...the lands was placed in issue by the pleadings in the former case and necessarily passed upon in the determination thereof. (Graham v. Culver, 3 Wyo. 639; Judgments 505.) The case of Warwick v. Underwood, 75 Am. Dec. 767, is directly in point; also Johnson v. San Francisco Union, 7 A. S. R.......
-
Norris v. United Mineral Products Company, 2306
...Court has held in several cases that a judgment is conclusive of all matters which might have been litigated in the suit. Graham v. Culver, 3 Wyo. 639; 30 P. 937; v. C. B. & Q. R. R., 24 Wyo. 305; 157 P. 698; Cook v. Elmore, 27 Wyo. 163; 192 P. 824. This court recognized the right of Hunter......
-
Brickel v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co.
...Inc. v. Gillette Safety Razor Co., 5 C.A., 1961, 295 F.2d 362; Hennessy v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 24 Wyo. 305, 157 P. 698; Graham v. Culver, 3 Wyo. 639, 29 P. 270, 30 P. From what I have said, I hold that the Motion for Summary Judgment should be, and the same is hereby, sustained. Rule 5......
- Hardin v. Hancock