Grand Rapids Bar Ass'n v. Denkema
Citation | 290 Mich. 56,287 N.W. 377 |
Decision Date | 05 September 1939 |
Docket Number | October term, 1938.,No. 44,44 |
Parties | GRAND RAPIDS BAR ASS'N et al. v. DENKEMA. |
Court | Supreme Court of Michigan |
Suit by the Grand Rapids Bar Association and others against Henry Denkema, to enjoin defendant from unauthorized practice of law. From an adverse decree, defendant appeals.
Modified and affirmed.
NORTH and WIEST, JJ., dissenting. Appeal from Circuit Court, Kent County, in Chancery; Leonard D. Verdier, Judge.
Argued before the Entire Bench, except BUTZEL, C. J.
Dorr Kuizema and Cornelius Hoffius, both of Grand Rapids, for appellant.
Kenneth P. Hansma, of Grand Rapids (F. Roland Allaben and Benn M. Corwin, both of Grand Rapids, of counsel), for appellees.
Dean W. Kelley, of Lansing, Chairman Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of State Bar of Michigan (George E. Brand, of Detroit, of counsel), amici curiae.
Plaintiffs, Grand Rapids Bar Association, F. Roland Allaben and Benn M. Corwin, trustees and members of a committee of the Grand Rapids Bar Association on the unauthorized practice of the law, filed bill of complaint in the circuit court for Kent county against Henry Denkema to enjoin him from doing certain things, and for other relief as defendant's conduct might merit.
Defendant is a resident of the city of Grand Rapids, not a licensed attorney and counselor at law, who has for a number of years been engaged in the business of general insurance and real estate loans under the firm name of Herman N. Dosker & Company. Defendant is not personally a licensed real estate broker and has never sold real estate. He testified:
* * *
* * *
The trial court enjoined defendant from drafting any proposed will, outline or suggestion thereof for another; preparing and filing papers in connection with the probating and appearing in probate court for the purpose of obtaining orders and decrees, except in cases in which he acts as guardian, administrator, executor or trustee; advising persons in connection with the probating of estates; examining and giving opinions on abstracts of title of real property; preparing for others legal instruments incidental to the sale, leasing or mortgaging of real property, except in cases in which he is one of the parties in interest; practicing law and performing legal services for and giving legal advice to others, in Michigan. Defendant appeals from portions of the decree of the trial court, urging that he should be allowed to do some of the things which the trial court enjoined him from doing.
‘Any suitor in any court of this state shall have the right to prosecute or defend his suit, either in his own proper person or by an attorney or agent of his choice.’ Const.1908, art. 2, § 12.
In Cobb v. Judge of Superior Court, 43 Mich. 289, 5 N.W. 309, this court held that by ‘an attorney or agent’ was meant an attorney, and it denied the right of a disbarred attorney to represent the defendant as an agent in a court of record.
People ex rel. Hughes v. May, 3 Mich. 598.
In Detroit Bar Association v. Trust Co., 282 Mich. 216, 276 N.W. 365, 366, quotation was made from Hightower v. Detroit Edison Co., 262 Mich. 1, 247 N.W. 97, 86 A.L.R. 509, as follows:
‘In a case in court, determination of the steps to be taken and control of procedure and proceedings to enforce the remedy are exclusive functions of an attorney-at-law, where a party does not appear in his own person. * * *
‘Counsel and advice, the drawing of agreements, the organization of corporations and preparing papers connected therewith, the drafting of legal documents of all kinds, including wills, are activities which have long been classed as law practice.’ People v. Alfani, 227 N.Y. 334, 125 N.E. 671, 673.
In re Duncan, 83 S.C. 186, 65 S.E. 210, 211, 24 L.R.A.,N.S., 750, 18 Ann.Cas. 657.
Eley v. Miller, 7 Ind.App. 529, 34 N.E. 836, 837.
‘Persons acting professionally in legal formalities, negotiations or proceedings by the warrant or authority of their clients may be regarded as attorneys at law within the meaning of that designation as used in this country.’ National Savings Bank v. Ward, 100 U.S. 195, 199, 25 L.Ed. 621.
The practice of law is not confined to the practice in courts of the State, but it includes the preparation of pleadings and other papers incident to any action or special proceeding in any court or other judicial body, conveyancing, the preparation of all legal instruments of all kinds whereby a legal right is secured, the rendering of opinions as to the validity or invalidity of the title to real estate or personal property, the giving of legal advice in any action taken for others in any matter connected with the law. Boykin v. Hopkins, 174 Ga. 511, 162 S.E. 796.
Opinion of the Justices, 289 Mass. 607, 194 N.E. 313, 317.
The statute (3 Comp.Laws 1929, § 13587) provides: ‘It shall be unlawful for any person who is not a regularly licensed attorney and counselor of this State * * * to practice law or to engage in the law business.’
It would be extremely difficult to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mark W., Application of
...N.E.2d 250, 251 (Ind.1984), quoting Matter of Perrello, 270 Ind. 390, 398, 386 N.E.2d 174, 179 (1979); Grand Rapids Bar Ass'n v. Denkema, 290 Mich. 56, 62-4, 287 N.W. 377, 379-80 (1939); In Re Thompson, 574 S.W.2d 365, 366 (Mo. en banc 1978); Appell v. Reiner, 81 N.J.Super. 229, 236, 195 A.......
-
Lowell Bar Ass'n v. Loeb
...Wis. 38, 56, 294 N.W. 550;Childs v. Smeltzer, 315 Pa. 9, 171 A. 883;State v. Childe, 139 Neb. 91, 295 N.W. 381;Grand Rapids Bar Association v. Denkema, 290 Mich. 56, 287 N.W. 377;Cowern v. Nelson, 207 Minn. 642, 290 N.W. 795;Cain v. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co., 66 N.D. 746, 268 N.W.......
-
State Bar v. Cramer
...jurisprudence such practice must necessarily change with the everchanging business and social order'. Grand Rapids Bar Association v. Denkema, 290 Mich. 56, 64, 287 N.W. 377, 380 (1939). No essential definition of the practice of law has been articulated and the descriptive definitions whic......
-
Bump v. District Court of Polk County
... ... Rice, 236 ... Wis. 38, 294 N.W. 550; Grand Rapids Bar Ass'n v. Denkema, ... 290 Mich. 56, 287 N.W. 377; Fitchette v ... ...
-
How Should Legal Ethics Rules Apply When Artificial Intelligence Assists Pro Se Litigants?
...developers from even trying to enter the market.” 76 The development of AI capable of 69. Grand Rapids Bar Ass’n v. Denkema, 287 N.W. 377, 380 (Mich. 1939) (“It would be extremely difficult to formulate an accurate definition of the ‘practice of law’ which might endure, for the reason tha......