Grayer v. State

Decision Date03 February 1988
Docket NumberNo. 57379,57379
Citation519 So.2d 438
PartiesCharles Albert GRAYER v. STATE of Mississippi.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

Charles A. Grayer, Parchman, pro se.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman and Mike Moore, Attys. Gen. by DeWitt Allred, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and ROBERTSON and GRIFFIN, JJ.

ROBERTSON, Justice, for the court:

Charles Albert Grayer seeks vacation of his guilty plea to the crime of assault with intent to rape entered March 25, 1970, upon which he was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Grayer flat-timed his sentence. The conviction still haunts him as it has been used to enhance to habitual offender status a subsequent burglary conviction.

Grayer applied to the Circuit Court for the First Judicial District of Hinds County for post-conviction relief. The Circuit Court by order entered on March 21, 1986, denied that relief. Grayer presents the present appeal urging four grounds only one of which merits comment.

Grayer urges that his 1970 conviction was unlawful because it was entered upon a plea of guilty to a crime for which he had not been indicted. To be sure, our law declares void and of no effect a plea of guilty to a crime separate and distinct from the crime charged in the indictment and not a constituent offense thereof. Box v. State, 241 So.2d 158, 159 (Miss.1970). For example, a person indicted for manslaughter could not enter an enforceable plea of guilty to the crime of embezzlement. Our Constitution requires indictment by a grand jury before a prosecution may be had. Miss. Const. Art. 3, Sec. 27 (1890). In such a hypothetical case, there would have been no grand jury indictment for the offense of embezzlement.

On the other hand, reduced charges are of the essence of the plea bargaining process. No one questions enforceability of a plea entered to a lesser included constituent offense to that charged in the indictment.

In the case at bar, Grayer was charged in an indictment returned by the Grand Jury of the First Judicial District of Hinds County, Mississippi, in March of 1970 with the crime of forcible rape. See Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 2358 (1942). 1 Grayer originally pled not guilty to this charge. Thereafter, Grayer entered into plea bargain negotiations resulting in his plea to the charge of assault with intent to rape. The minutes of the Circuit Court of March 25, 1970, read:

Now comes the defendant in his own proper person and by counsel and withdraws the plea of not guilty to the charge of rape heretofore entered, and enters a plea of guilty under Section 2361, 2 Mississippi Code of 1942 instead. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the defendant, Charles Albert Grayer, for such his crime is rape to which he has entered a plea of guilty under Section 2361, Mississippi Code of 1942, be and is hereby sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the Mississippi State Penitentiary.

Quite apparently a conventional plea bargain occurred. Forcible rape under Section 2358 at the time contemplated only two possible sentences: death or life imprisonment. Assault with intent to rape under Section 2361, however, authorized a punishment up to life imprisonment but also provided for "such shorter time as may be fixed by the jury." In the plea bargain context, of course, the ten year sentence was well within the authority of Section 2361.

Grayer would have us hold that assault with intent to rape is not a lesser included constituent offense of forcible rape. Under the Box rule Grayer urges that the judgment of conviction entered upon his guilty plea is void and of no further force and effect. Superficial support for this idea appears in Thames v. State, 221 Miss. 573, 577, 73 So.2d 134, 136 (1954), which reads:

Under Code Section 2361 the previous chaste character of the female is an essential element of the crime. [citation omitted] Previous chaste character of the female is not an element of rape under Code Section 2358.

221 Miss. at 577, 73 So.2d at 136.

The State takes the argument seriously and engages in a considerable flight of fancy arguing that the reference in the Circuit Court minute entry to Section 2361 is somehow erroneous. We would not give such an argument the time of day if advanced by Defendant, and we credit it no more as it is advanced by the State. See Evans v. State, 144 Miss. 1, 6, 108 So. 725, 726 (1926).

The quick answer is that assault with intent to rape under Section 2361 is sufficiently a constituent offense of forcible rape such that a plea-bargain-induced guilty plea thereto under an indictment charging forcible rape will withstand subsequent post-conviction attack. The element of "previous chaste character" contemplated...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Shaw
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 12 Agosto 2004
    ...that particular form of manslaughter contemplates proof of facts inconsistent with the principal charge of murder." Grayer v. State, 519 So.2d 438, 440 n. 3 (Miss.1988) (quoting Isom v. State, 481 So.2d 820, 824-25 (Miss.1985)). Manslaughter is a lesser-included offense of murder. Id. at 82......
  • Hailey v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 7 Diciembre 1988
    ...308 (Miss.1984); Colburn v. State, 431 So.2d 1111 (Miss.1983); and Presley v. State, 321 So.2d 309 (Miss.1975). Recently in Grayer v. State, 519 So.2d 438 (Miss.1988), this Court held that assault with intent to rape "is sufficiently a constituent offense of forcible rape such that a plea-b......
  • Simpson v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • 27 Mayo 2008
    ...proof of facts inconsistent with the principal charge of murder.'" Shaw, 880 So.2d 296, 304(¶ 27) (Miss.2004) (quoting Grayer v. State, 519 So.2d 438, 440 n. 3 (Miss.1988)). In Shaw, at trial, the defendant was granted a directed verdict on his murder charge, and the trial court did not all......
  • State v. Shaw
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 9 Octubre 2003
    ...indictment of the charges for which he is being prosecuted. See Hailey v. State, 537 So.2d 411, 416 (Miss. 1988); Grayer v. State, 519 So.2d 438, 439 (Miss. 1988). Likewise, indictments must "fully notify the defendant of the nature of the cause of the accusation." URCCC 7.06. An indictment......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT