Green v. Grinnell Co.

Decision Date07 July 1948
Docket Number16100.
PartiesGREEN v. GRINNELL CO., Inc. et al.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Wise Whaley & McCutchen, of Columbia, for appellants.

C. T. Graydon and John Grimball both of Columbia for respondent.

TAYLOR Justice.

The respondent, G. E. Green, contends that he received an injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment with the Grinnell Company, Inc., at their place of business in Charleston, South Carolina, on or about February 26, 1947. Said company was operating under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act, Code 1942, § 7035-1 et seq., with Employers Liability Assurance Corporation, Ltd. as its insurance carrier. After appellication was made for disability benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act the single Commissioner made an award in favor of claimant, which was sustained by the majority of the Commission. From such findings, the defendants appealed to the Court of Common Pleas for Richland County, which affirmed the award in its order dated November 24, 1947. It is from this order the defendants now appeal to this Court upon exceptions which pose the question of whether there is any evidence to sustain the findings of the Industrial Commission to the effect that plaintiff sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Act.

On or about February 26, 1947, claimant, along with two other employees of the defendant company, were loading three--or four-inch pipe onto a truck. After loading one of the pieces of pipe, claimant noticed a pain in the right leg, which caused him to shortly thereafter begin limping, so much so that it was noticed by the other two men. Claimant, thinking he had only sprained a muscle, waited approximately one week before going to Dr. Rhame, who gave him some sort of medicine for external application and told him to return if the trouble was not eliminated. Claimant, feeling better for a time, did not return immediately for treatment. By April 11, 1947, claimant testified that he realized his injury was something serious and would require further treatment. He therefore returned to his home in Columbia, South Carolina, where he consulted Dr. James T. Green, whose testimony in part appears as follows: 'Q. Just tell us, Doctor, what the history was that he gave you? A. On April 11th the came to see me and told me that about six weeks prior to that time, while he was employed by the Grinnell Company and working in Charleston, South Carolina, he sustained an injury to the right leg. He was hauling four-inch pipe from the Charleston Linen Supply Company to the Stark General Hospital and transforming this pipe from the ground to the truck when he had this rather sudden pain in the when he had this rather sudden pain in the right hip and buttocks. Then he told me the time he lost a half a day from work, but continued to work until just prior to the time he consulted me. The pain in the buttocks and the leg had continued and was increased by exercise, long walking, standing. Sleep had not been disturbed, although when he arose in the morning his leg was stiff and he had difficulty in walking on the right leg for the first few minutes. He had very little discomfort in the low part of the back and had no peculiar sensations in the right leg other than the pain.

'On examination, I found that the contour of the back was essentially normal; forward bending was limited to about sixty percent of normal; hyperextension and lateral bending essentially normal. Straight-leg raising on the right side was positive and about forty-five degrees; a straight-leg raising on the left side caused pain to be referred down the right leg. The rest of the examination was essentially negative. There was no great discomfort in the low part of his back on any maneuver or any application of pressure. X-rays were the most important and the most significant in the examination, at which time it was revealed that he had a congenital or developmental defect in the spine with some anterior slipping of the fourth lumbar vertebra on the sacrum. It was felt at that time that the thing had been of long standing and probably the exertion of lifting the heavy pipe from one place to another caused some additional slipping in the spine and some nerve root compression with resultant pain in the leg. I thought very likely the thing could be carried through on a conservative basis. It seemed to be relatively mild. So I had him remain in bed at home for a period of three weeks, but there was no improvement in the situation. I notified to them that I might put him in suggested to them that I might put him in the hospital if they had no objections. I heard no objections from them, and had him hospitalized at the Columbia Hospital, where traction was applied, with fairly prompt relief in pain.

'A few days after the relief in pain I allowed him up and allowed him to return to his home, and, just on normal activity, he had recurrence of pain. The pain apparently had become more acute during the past few weeks. I rehospitalized him and re-applied traction to his leg, but still he continued to have pain, and this time it was severe enough to require an opiate for the relief.

'I have taken additional X-rays in the standing position and in the lying position and find no change in the position of the two vertebrae. The X-rays can be super-imposed without any additional forward slipping.

'I believe that this man has a severe enough defect to require an operation to fuse that part of his spine. He has got a very definitely unstable spine, and I believe that before he gets complete relief he is going to have to have that portion of his spine fused.

'I have an X-ray if the Commissioner would like to see it. I will demonstrate if it you would like for me to do it.

'There is the defect across there (indicating on X-ray film), and the idea would be to go in with a bone graft. I think he's got nerve root compression right at this point where the nerve root comes out.

'Q. There is no other treatment now that you fell will give him any permanent relief except this operation? A. I am afraid that is the only thing that will give him relief. At times these things in young people will respond to conservative thereapy, such as bed rest, to overcome the acute phase. The acute phase is usually accompanied by muscle spasm that holds the thing rather rigid. With bed rest and traction the thing is frequently overcome and they go along in a reasonably normal manner for a long period of time before they have any further recurrence.

'Q. He has testified that he did get relief from the hospitalization and rest in bed, but that a little while after he got up and started his normal movements he suffered even greater pain. A. Yes, sir.

'Q. You have testified that this was a congential condition; that he went along all right apparently, inasmuch as there is no record he had had any trouble prior to this time in February when he was lifting this pipe, but that lifting that pipe and having that strain what we call aggravated or caused that pre-existing condition to flare up to where it had become activated? A. That's correct. He gave a history that he had had no previous symptoms and thought he was perfectly normal in every way and was as strong as the average individual.'

'Cross Examination

'Q. Doctor, are you related to the claimant? A. No, sir. I had never seen the claimant prior to the time he came to see me.

'Q. Dr. Green, with this congenital condition--A. (Interposing) You may call it congenital or developmental. We don't know exactly what it is, whether congential or developmental.

'Commissioner Johnson: He was either born with it or it gradually developed during a period of time?

'The Witness: That's right.

'Q. With your description of it, that condition which he had could have been aggravated, as you just said, by any lifeing? A. By any severe force, yes, violent force, I would say.

'Q. And it just happened to occur wheh he was lifting this particular piece of pipe? A. That's correct.

'Q. He could have been at home moving a bed or pushing an automobile or any other relatively similar work? A. I think that's correct.

'Q. Is he disabled at the present time? A. I would say he is totally disabled at the present time, yes, sir.

'Q. Do you or do you not think that condition of disability will continue until this fusion? A. I am inclined to believe that it will continue until he has something definite done for it so as to stabilize that unstable portion of his spine.

'Q. Should...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Buff v. Columbia Baking Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • June 10, 1949
    ... ... Cokeley v. Robert Lee, Inc., 197 S.C. 157, 14 S.E.2d ... 889; Shehane v. Springs Cotton Mills, 206 S.C. 334, ... 34 S.E.2d 180.' Green v. Grinnell Co., 213 S.C ... 116, 48 S.E.2d 644, 647 ...          The ... deceased was employed on the date of his death, October 21, ... ...
  • Schrader v. Monarch Mills
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 12, 1949
    ... ... Cokeley v. Robert Lee, Inc., 197 S.C. 157, 14 S.E.2d ... 889; Shehane v. Springs Cotton Mills, 206 S.C. 334, ... 34 S.E.2d 180; Green v. Grinnell Co., 213 S.C. 116, ... 48 S.E.2d 644; White v. Carolina Light & Power Co., S.C., ... 53 S.E.2d 872; Buff v. Columbia Banking Co. et ... ...
  • White v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • June 2, 1949
    ... ... Cokeley v. Robert Lee, Inc., 197 S.C. 157, 14 S.E.2d ... 889; Shehane v. Springs Cotton Mills, 206 S.C. 334, ... 34 S.E.2d 180.' Green v. Grinnell Co., 213 S.C ... 116, 48 S.E.2d 644, 647 ...           At the ... time of the injury deceased had been working for the ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT