Green v. Weaver, 62855

Decision Date27 January 1982
Docket NumberNo. 62855,62855
Citation291 S.E.2d 247,161 Ga.App. 295
PartiesGREEN v. WEAVER et al.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

J. Robert Joiner, Albany, for appellant.

Ronald P. Jayson, Decatur, for appellees.

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

This case involves the dismissal of a notice of appeal with reference to a verdict and judgment in a dispossessory proceeding for nonpayment of rent. The notice of appeal stated that the entire record was necessary and a transcript would be included. The motion to dismiss the appeal alleges that the notice of appeal was timely, but that as of the date of the filing of the motion neither the record nor the transcript had been prepared and forwarded, nor had the appellant moved the court for an extension of time within the time provided by law.

The finding of the trial court was that no order was entered extending the time for filing of a transcript in the appeal and concluded as a matter of law that same had to be applied for and granted within 30 days of the notice of appeal being filed, as same "is jurisdictional in nature and is mandatory." The motion to dismiss the appeal was granted, and the appeal was dismissed. The appellant here appeals this dismissal. Held :

As has been stated in Young v. Climatrol Southeast Dist. Corp., 237 Ga. 53, 55, 226 S.E.2d 737, "the time provided for filing the transcript or record is not jurisdictional, but merely a means of avoiding unreasonable delay so that the case can be presented on the earliest possible calendar in the appellate courts." The Supreme Court at page 54, 226 S.E.2d 737, quoted from Code Ann. § 6-809(b) (Ga.L.1965, pp. 18, 29; 1965, pp. 240, 241; 1966, pp. 493, 500; 1968, pp. 1072, 1073, 1074; 1972, p. 624; 1978, p. 1986) that " 'where there has been an unreasonable delay in the filing of such transcript and it is shown that the delay was inexcusable and was caused by [the appellant] the trial court may order the appeal dismissed.' " Clearly, the trial court was in error in dismissing this appeal based upon jurisdictional grounds and in failing to determine whether or not the delay, if any, was "unreasonable," and then "inexcusable." See also in this connection such cases as DuBois v. DuBois, 240 Ga. 314(1), 240 S.E.2d 706; Gilman Paper Co. v. James, 235 Ga. 348, 349, 219 S.E.2d 447; McIntyre v. Gulf Oil Corp., 151 Ga.App. 855, 856-857, 261 S.E.2d 766; ITT Industrial Credit Co. v. Burnham, 152 Ga.App. 641, 642, 263 S.E.2d 482; Mawhorter v. Mawhorter, 161 Ga.App....

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Cook v. McNamee
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 5, 1996
    ...transcript [did not prevent] the placement of the case on the earliest possible calendar in [the Court of Appeals] (Green [v. Weaver, 161 Ga.App. 295, 296, 291 S.E.2d 247 ] ) or [delay] docketing of the appeal and the hearing of the case in this court. See American Oil Co. v. McCluskey, 116......
  • Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corp. v. Planes, Inc.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 22, 1983
    ...unreasonable delay so that the case can be presented on the earliest possible calendar in the appellate courts.' " Green v. Weaver, 161 Ga.App. 295, 296, 291 S.E.2d 247. See also OCGA § 5-6-48 (formerly Code Ann. § 6-809 (Ga.L.1965, pp. 18, 29; 1965, pp. 240, 241; 1966, pp. 493, 500; 1968, ......
  • Green v. Weaver, 64234
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 4, 1982
    ...Jayson, Decatur, for appellees. McMURRAY, Presiding Judge. This is the second appearance of this case in this court. See Green v. Weaver, 161 Ga.App. 295, 291 S.E.2d 247. However, the ruling of this court in that case has no bearing on this On the return of the remittitur the trial court wi......
  • Galletta v. Hillcrest Abbey West, Inc., 75127
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • November 4, 1987
    ...a means of avoiding delay so the case can be presented on the earliest possible calendar in the appellate courts. Green v. Weaver, 161 Ga.App. 295, 296, 291 S.E.2d 247. OCGA § 5-6-30 provides that the appellate practice article shall be liberally construed so as to bring about a decision on......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT