Greene v. Piedmont Janitorial Services, Inc.
Decision Date | 15 March 1996 |
Docket Number | No. A95A2216,A95A2216 |
Citation | 470 S.E.2d 270,220 Ga.App. 743 |
Parties | GREENE et al. v. PIEDMONT JANITORIAL SERVICES, INC. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Cooper, Hewitt & Katz, Robert N. Katz, Atlanta, for appellants.
Webb, Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair, David F. Root, Mary K. Smith, Atlanta, for appellee.
Plaintiff Barbara L. Greene and her husband, Raymond E. Greene, Sr., brought this tort action against defendant Piedmont Janitorial Services, Inc. ("Piedmont"), alleging that plaintiff Barbara L. Greene slipped and injured herself due to the slippery condition of the floor "resulting from Defendant's negligence with respect to maintaining the floor of the restroom at the [NationsBank] office where Plaintiff was employed," at 2059 Northlake Parkway, in Tucker, Georgia. Specifically, Piedmont was alleged to have "applied an excessive amount of cleaning products to the floor...." Piedmont was further "negligent in that it failed to warn ..." plaintiff of the dangerous condition in the restroom. Plaintiff Raymond E. Greene, Sr. claimed loss of consortium.
Piedmont answered, admitting that "it had a contract to provide certain cleaning services in the building where plaintiff is alleged to have fallen," but denying the material allegations of negligence. The case was tried before a jury. At the close of plaintiffs' case, Piedmont moved for a directed verdict, which was granted in part and denied in part. The jury subsequently found for the defendant. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment entered on that defense verdict. Held:
1. Plaintiffs first contend the trial court erred in excluding evidence that Piedmont had been "notified that two persons had slipped and fallen ... in restrooms maintained by [Piedmont] which [were] the same and/or similar to the restroom in which [plaintiff Barbara L. Greene] fell...." They proffered Hanson Farmer, the president of Piedmont, who would have confirmed that, "prior to Barbara Greene falling, the building manager reported to you, to Piedmont Janitorial Services that two persons had slipped and fallen in the restrooms in the NationsBank building[.]" Hanson Farmer made it clear, however, that he had no personal knowledge of when, where, or under what circumstances these other spills occurred. To his knowledge, he Plaintiffs argue that this evidence was admissible to show that Piedmont "was placed on notice that a dangerous condition existed in the restrooms it maintained."
"Generally, it may be said that it is not permissible, for the purpose of establishing whether a condition at one place is dangerous to show conditions at places other than the one in question." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) McCoy v. Gay, 165 Ga.App. 590, 592, 302 S.E.2d 130. Carlton Co. v. Poss, 124 Ga.App. 154, 155(3), 183 S.E.2d 231, aff'd, Poss v. Carlton Co., 228 Ga. 402, 185 S.E.2d 803. In the case sub judice, plaintiffs' proffer is inadequate to establish the cause of any falls by other persons in other restrooms maintained by defendant Piedmont. It is sheer speculation to say that evidence of these unrelated and indefinite circumstances is proof of the same negligently excessive use of cleaning products as allegedly caused Barbara L. Greene to fall when and where she did. Barbara L. Greene failed to show that these other Sparks v. Pine Forest Enterprises, 174 Ga.App. 598, 600, 331 S.E.2d 34 (physical precedent). The trial court did not err in excluding this irrelevant evidence of other accidents.
2. At the close of plaintiffs' case, Piedmont moved for a directed verdict. The trial court granted this motion in part, ruling that plaintiffs failed to adduce "any evidence of [Piedmont's] failure to police or inspect" the premises. This partial direction of the verdict is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ahuja v. Cumberland Mall, LLC
...the premises. Kelley v. Piggly Wiggly S., Inc., 230 Ga.App. 508, 509, 496 S.E.2d 732 (1997). See also Greene v. Piedmont Janitorial Serv., Inc., 220 Ga.App. 743, 744, 470 S.E.2d 270 (1996) (Georgia's premises liability statute does not apply to an independent contractor). Defendant Millard ......
-
Perkins v. Compass Group Use, Inc.
...Inc., 230 Ga.App. 508, 509, 496 S.E.2d 732 (Ga. App.1997) (internal citations omitted); see also Greene v. Piedmont Janitorial Servs., Inc., 220 Ga.App. 743, 744, 470 S.E.2d 270 (Ga.App.1996) (O.C.G.A. § 51-3-1 does not impose any duty on independent contractor to, inspect the premises of t......
-
Ikomoni v. Executive Asset Mgmt.
...See, e.g., Taylor v. AmericasMart Real Estate, 287 Ga.App. 555, 557(1)(a), 651 S.E.2d 754 (2007); Greene v. Piedmont Janitorial Svcs., 220 Ga.App. 743, 744–745(2), 470 S.E.2d 270 (1996). SunTrust was the legal title holder of the foreclosed property, and thus the duty to comply with the sta......
-
Kelley v. Piggly Wiggly Southern
...and Sendra because they are independent contractors, not owners or occupiers of the premises. Greene v. Piedmont Janitorial Services, 220 Ga.App. 743, 744-745(2), 470 S.E.2d 270 (1996). In a negligence case, a plaintiff must show that a defendant's negligence caused her injuries. Contrary t......