Gregory v. City of Memphis
| Decision Date | 26 May 1928 |
| Citation | 6 S.W.2d 332 |
| Parties | GREGORY v. CITY OF MEMPHIS et al. |
| Court | Tennessee Supreme Court |
Appeal from Chancery Court, Shelby County; D. W. De Haven, Chancellor.
Suit by Robert C. Gregory against the City of Memphis and others. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Robert C. Gregory, in pro. per.
Walter Chandler, of Memphis, for appellees.
By the bill filed in this cause the complainant seeks to enjoin the officials of the city of Memphis from interfering with him in representing parties before the city court as attorney, notwithstanding he has not been licensed to practice law.
Section 5772 of Shannon's Code is as follows:
"No person shall practice as an attorney or counsel in any of the courts of this state without a license obtained for that purpose, and without first having taken an oath, in open court, to support the constitution of the state and of the United States, and to truly and honestly demean himself in the practice of his profession to the best of his skill and abilities."
Complainant, emphasizing the preposition "of," insists that the statute prohibits practicing law in the courts "of" this state, as distinguished from the courts "in" this state, contending that the city court of Memphis is not one of the courts "of" the state.
The prepositions "of" and "in" are frequently used synonymously. 6 Words and Phrases, First Series, p. 4912.
The Legislature, in our opinion, intended to make the practice of law in any of the courts in this state a privilege, which it had authority to do. 6 C. J. 569.
Article 6, section 1, of the Constitution of Tennessee, is in this language:
This system of courts constitutes the judicial department of the state. Jackson v. Nimmo, 3 Lea (71 Tenn.) 600.
The corporation court, provided for in the Constitution as a part of the judicial system of the state, refers to a municipal corporation, and a similar provision for such courts was contained in the Constitution of 1834.
The complainant seems to have overlooked the fact that a municipal court is a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Summers v. Thompson
...203 Tenn. 498, 504, 314 S.W.2d 12, 14 (1958); Moore v. State, 159 Tenn. 468, 469, 19 S.W.2d 233, 233 (1929); Gregory v. City of Memphis, 157 Tenn. 68, 70, 6 S.W.2d 332, 332 (1928); Deming v. Nichols, 135 Tenn. 295, 303, 186 S.W. 113, 115 (1916); O'Haver v. Montgomery, 120 Tenn. 448, 463, 11......
-
People v. Hallner
...Co. v. City of Baltimore, 110 Md. 306, 72 A. 1039, 1041. 'Courts 'of' the state' means 'courts 'in' the state'. Gregory v. City of Memphis, 157 Tenn. 68, 6 S.W.2d 332. 'Of a city' was used in a geographic sense, not in a possessive one. Avant v. Ouachita Parish School Board, 215 La. 990, 41......
-
Cox v. Huddleston
...skill and ability. Clearly, this statute satisfies the definition of privilege set out in Jenkins. Moreover, in Gregory v. City of Memphis, 157 Tenn. 68, 6 S.W.2d 332 (1928), our Supreme Court, in dealing with Section 5772 of Shannon's Code, the predecessor to T.C.A. § 23-1-108, The legisla......
-
State ex rel. Haywood v. Superintendent, Davidson County Workhouse
...of legislative authority to a municipality in plain violation of the Constitution of Tennessee. The case of Gregory v. City of Memphis, 157 Tenn. 68, 6 S.W.2d 332, relied on by appellant has no application to the question raised on this The provision in the Act which confers upon the court ......