Gregory v. Helvering
Decision Date | 07 January 1935 |
Docket Number | No. 127,127 |
Citation | 79 L.Ed. 596,97 A.L.R. 1355,293 U.S. 465,55 S.Ct. 266 |
Parties | GREGORY v. HELVERING, Commissioner of Internal Revenue |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
[Syllabus from 466 intentionally omitted] Mr. Hugh Satterlee, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
The Attorney General and Mr. J. Crawford Biggs, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Petitioner in 1928 was the owner of all the stock of United Mortgage Corporation. That corporation held among its assets 1,000 shares of the Monitor Securities Corporation. For the sole purpose of procuring a transfer of these shares to herself in order to sell them for her individual profit, and, at the same time, diminish the amount of income tax which would result from a direct transfer by way of dividend, she sought to bring about a 'reorganization' under section 112(g) of the Revenue Act of 1928, c. 852, 45 Stat. 791, 816, 818, 26 USCA § 2112(g), set forth later in this opinion. To that end, she caused the Averill Corporation to be organized under the laws of Delaware on September 18, 1928. Three days later, the United Mortgage Corporation transferred to the Averill Corporation the 1,000 shares of Monitor stock, for which all the shares of the Averill Corporation were issued to the petitioner. On September 24, the Averill Corporation was dissolved, and liquidated by distributing all its assets, namely, the Monitor shares, to the petitioner. No other business was ever transacted, or intended to be transacted, by that company. Petitioner immediately sold the Monitor shares for $133,333.33. She returned for taxation, as capital net gain, the sum of $76,007.88, based upon an apportioned cost of $57,325.45. Further details are unnecessary. It is not disputed that if the interposition of the so-called reorganization was ineffective, petitioner became liable for a much larger tax as a result of the transaction.
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, being of opinion that the reorganization attempted was without substance and must be disregarded, held that petitioner was liable for a tax as though the United corporation had paid her a dividend consisting of the amount realized from the sale of the Monitor shares. In a proceeding before the Board of Tax Appeals, that body rejected the commissioner's view and upheld that of petitioner. 27 B.T.A. 223. Upon a review of the latter decision, the Circuit Court of Appeals sustained the commissioner and reversed the board, holding that there had been no 'reorganization' within the meaning of the statute. 69 F.(2d) 809. Petitioner applied to this court for a writ of certiorari, which the government, considering the question one of importance, did not oppose. We granted the writ. 293 U.S. 538, 55 S.Ct. 82, 79 L.Ed. —-.
Section 112 of the Revenue Act of 1928 (26 USCA § 2112) deals with the subject of gain or loss resulting from the sale or exchange of property. Such gain or loss is to be recognized in computing the tax, except as provided in that section. The provisions of the section, so far as they are pertinent to the question here presented, follow:
* * *
'(1) The term 'reorganization' means * * * (B) a transfer by a corporation of all or a part of its assets to another corporation if immediately after the transfer the transferor or its stockholders or both are in control of the corporation to which the assets...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The Tax Matters Partner v. USA, Civil Action No. 3:06cv379-HTW-MTP.
...“while it is axiomatic that taxpayers lawfully may arrange their affairs to keep taxes as low as possible,” Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465, 469, 55 S.Ct. 266, 79 L.Ed. 596 (1935), the issue in any such dispute as this is whether the arrangement in question was accomplished in a lawful m......
-
In re Harris Teeter, LLC
...is not even a patriotic duty to increase one's taxes." Helvering v. Gregory , 69 F.2d 809, 810 (2d Cir. 1934), aff'd , 293 U.S. 465, 55 S.Ct. 266, 79 L.Ed. 596 (1935) (quoted in United States v. Carlton , 512 U.S. 26, 36, 114 S.Ct. 2018, 129 L.Ed.2d 22 (1994) (O'Connor, J. concurring)).¶ 65......
-
Van Raden v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, Docket Nos. 1336–76
...setting in which all appear, and which all collectively create. ( Gregory v. Helvering, 69 F. 2d 809, 810–811 (2d Cir. 1934), affd. 293 U.S. 465 (1935).] Unfortunately, the majority has heard the notes but not the melody.SIMPSON and QUEALY, JJ., agree with this dissenting opinion.CHABOT, J.......
-
Santa Monica Pictures, LLC, v. Commissioner, Dkt. No. 6163-03.
...we are guided by the foundational principles that the U.S. Supreme Court stated in Gregory v. Helvering [35-1 USTC ¶ 9043], 293 U.S. 465, 469 (1935): "The legal right of a taxpayer to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes, or altogether avoid them, by means which the law ......
-
Tax Court Sides With Service In Holding That A STARS Transaction Entered Into By Bank Of New York Lacked Economic Substance Despite Transactions Literal Compliance With Code
...more than what a taxpayer is required to pay. See Boulware v. United States , 552 U.S. 421, 430 n.7 (2008) (citing Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465, 469 (1935)); Gerdau Macsteel, Inc. v. Commissioner, 139 T.C. ___, ___ (slip op. at 163-164) (Aug. 30, But formalistic adherence to the Code ......
-
Service Applies Substance Over Form Doctrine To DisallowDividends-Received Deduction
...determine its proper tax treatment based on the actual substance of the transaction. In the seminal case Gregory v. Helvering, 14 AFTR 1191,293 US 465,79 L Ed 596,1935-1 CB 193 (1935), the Supreme Court held that although the taxpayer has the legal right to reduce his tax liability by any l......
-
The Economic Substance Doctrine: A U.S. Anti-Abuse Rule
...Court recognized a taxpayer's right to minimize their tax exposure as long as Congress intended those tax benefits. Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935), citing U.S. v. Isham, 17 Wall. 496, 506; Bullen v. Wisconsin, 240 U.S. 625, The legal right of a taxpayer to decrease the amount of ......
-
Global Tax-Free Deals: Mergers, Acquisitions And Spins At Home And Abroad
...boot is permitted in B reorganizations and certain C reorganizations in which liabilities are assumed. 6 See, e.g., Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935) (reorganization that lacked business purpose was re-characterized as taxable stock transfer). Minimization of state and local taxes i......
-
Can the battle be won? Compaq, the sham transaction doctrine, and a critique of proposals to combat the corporate tax shelter dragon.
...We cannot ignore the reality that the tax laws affect the shape of nearly every business transaction."); Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465, 469 (1935) ("The legal right of a taxpayer to decrease the amount of what otherwise would be his taxes, or altogether avoid them, by means which the l......
-
Significant recent developments in estate planning.
...uses of CRUTs, see Gianno, "The Charitable Remainder Unitrust," 26 The Tax Adviser 435 (July 1995). (3) Evelyn F. Gregory v. Helvering, 293 US 465 (1935)(14 AFTR 1191, 35-1 USTC [paragraph] 29043). (4) Court Holding Co., 324 US 331 (1945)(33 AFTR 593, 45-1 USTC [paragraph]19215); Arnold Mal......
-
Rethinking the impact of sales taxes on government procurement practices: unintended consequences or good policy?
...Textualism and Substance-Over-Form Doctrines in Tax Law, 43 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 699, 700 (2003). (232) 69 F.2d 809 (2d Cir. 1934), affd, 293 U.S. 465 (233) 293 U.S. at 470. (234) Id. at 467. (235) Id. (236) Id. (237) Revenue Act of 1928, § 112(i)(1)(b) (currently I.R.C. § 368(a)(1) (1991)),......
-
CLEARTEXTUALISM AND SEXUALISM.
...more than that of the separate words, as a melody is more than the notes." Helvering v. Gregory, 69 F.2d 809, 810-11 (2d Cir. 1934).aff'd, 293 U.S. 465 A word's meaning within a statute is not only understood by looking at the accompanying words within a given phrase or sentence; the statut......
-
26 C.F.R. § 1.269-2 Purpose and Scope of Section 269
...of the taxpayer, has been judicially recognized and applied in several cases. Included in these cases are Gregory v. Helvering (1935) ( 293 U.S. 465; Ct. D. 911, C.B. XIV-1, 193); Griffiths v. Helvering (1939) ( 308 U.S. 355; Ct. D. 1431, C.B. 1940-1, 136); Higgins v. Smith (1940) ( 308 U.S......
-
26 C.F.R. § 301.6111-2 Confidential Corporate Tax Shelters
...guidance, and judicial decisions that establish principles of general application in the tax law (e.g., Gregory v. Helvering,293 U.S. 465(1935) ). The determination of the IRS would or would not have such a reasonable basis is qualitative in nature and does not depend on any percentage or o......