Gulf Heating & Refrigeration Co. v. Iowa Mut. Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 23 November 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 35471,35471 |
| Citation | 193 So.2d 4 |
| Parties | GULF HEATING AND REFRIGERATION COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, Petitioner, v. IOWA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Masterson, Lloyd, Sundberg & Rogers, St. Petersburg, and Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for petitioner.
Robert F. Nunez, St. Petersburg, for respondent.
Petitioner in this certiorari proceeding controverts a decision of the district court reversing a judgment for petitioner, the plaintiff in an action for wrongful garnishment.
Upon a review of plaintiff's evidence the district court held that 'the lower court erred in failing to grant Defendant's motion for directed verdict upon the conclusion of evidence submitted by Plaintiff and again upon the conclusion of all of the evidence.' 1 In view of the limited record before the appellate court, containing only plaintiff's evidence, we think the quoted ruling must be construed as one simply finding error in the denial of defendant's motion for directed verdict at the close of plaintiff's evidence. 2 To the extent that the language might indicate a decision of greater breadth, i.e. a finding of error in the failure to grant a directed verdict upon consideration of all the evidence, the appellate record was obviously insufficient to permit such a determination. 3
Certiorari in this Court is based on conflict between this decision, reversing a judgment entered on a jury verdict and directing that defendant's motion for directed verdict be granted upon appellate consideration of plaintiff's evidence alone and the rule pronounced in 6551 Collins Avenue Corp. v. Millen 4 that in this situation a defendant may obtain appellate review of that issue only by assignment of error directed to the trial judge's ruling on consideration of all the evidence adduced in the cause:
5
Upon a thorough study of the authorities referred to in the Millen opinion the conclusion is inescapable that under the federal doctrine of waiver there approved 6 a defendant, by proceeding with the presentation of his evidence, waives any error in denial of his initial motion, and that the court's ruling on the renewed motion required at the close of the case must be, as above stated, 'based on a consideration of All the evidence adduced in the cause.' 7
The appellate issue must accordingly be resolved by review of the defendant's as well as plaintiff's evidence. This disposition of the point is in accord with earlier decisions indicating that error in denying directed verdict on plaintiff's evidence may be cured by subsequent testimony. 8 The burden of framing proper appellate issues or correcting record omissions in the instant case did not, in our opinion, devolve upon the petitioner, appellee below. Florida Appellate Rule 3.6(d)(2), 31 F.S.A. Whatever may have been the breadth or deficiencies of appellee's contest of the appeal, such cannot logically serve to bolster the reversal in this case.
The decision below, upon the limited record and error assigned, is quashed with...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kalt v. Dollar Rent-A-Car
...(Fla.2d DCA 1968); Iowa Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gulf Heating & Refrigeration Co., 184 So.2d 705 (Fla.2d DCA 1966), quashed on other grounds, 193 So.2d 4 (Fla.1966); Hopke v. O'Byrne, 148 So.2d 755 (Fla.1st DCA 1963); Calbeck v. Town of South Pasadena, 128 So.2d 138 (Fla.2d DCA 1961); Wilson v. O'N......
-
Burshan v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA.
...prosecution." Iowa Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gulf Heating & Refrigeration Co., 184 So.2d 705, 706 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966),quashed on other grounds, 193 So.2d 4 (Fla.1966). As with the tort of malicious prosecution, two of the necessary elements of a cause of action for wrongful garnishment are (1) an abs......
-
Helmick v. Republic-Franklin Ins. Co.
...be in accord with the federal courts. See Abston v. Medora Grain, Inc. (1971), 206 Kan. 727, 482 P.2d 692; Gulf Heating & Refrigeration v. Iowa Mut. Ins. Co. (Fla.1966), 193 So.2d 4; Smith v. Sharp (1962), 85 Idaho 17, 375 P.2d The majority, in its zeal to give a defendant the right to pres......
-
Wagner v. Nottingham Associates, 84-105
...the trial court in denying his motion for directed verdict at the conclusion of all of the evidence. Gulf Heating & Refrigeration Co. v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co., 193 So.2d 4 (Fla.1966). Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.480(a) mandatorily requires that such "[a] motion for a directed verd......
-
Employment cases
...Source Iowa Mutual Ins. Co. v. Gulf Heating & Refrigeration Co ., 184 So.2d 705, 706 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966), quashed on other grounds , 193 So.2d 4 (Fla. 1966). §7:60.1.3 Elements of Cause of Action — 3rd DCA [No citation for this edition.] §7:60.1.4 Elements of Cause of Action — 4th DCA The pr......