Gunn v. State, 34842

Decision Date17 July 1979
Docket NumberNo. 34842,34842
Citation244 Ga. 51,257 S.E.2d 538
PartiesGUNN v. STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

James T. Irvin, Toccoa, for appellant.

V. D. Stockton, Dist. Atty., Micheal H. Crawford, Asst. Dist. Atty., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., William B. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

BOWLES, Justice.

Appellant was indicted in Stephens County along with Bleckley O'Bryn Morris and Glenda Garner for the offense of armed robbery. Upon conviction he filed a motion for new trial in the lower court which was overruled and he now appeals to this court.

1. He complains that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress an alleged confession made by him. In the course of the trial, the court conducted a Jackson v. Denno hearing in which the court concluded that his confession was freely and voluntarily given. There being ample evidence presented in the trial court to support its determination, it will not be disturbed on appeal.

2. Appellant complained for the first time in his motion for new trial that Code Ann. § 26-1902 (Ga.L.1968, p. 1249 et seq., as amended in Ga.L.1969, p. 810 et seq., and Ga.L.1976, p. 1359), is unconstitutional in that such law violates provisions of Art. I, Sec. II, Par. IV and Art. I, Sec. I, Par. XIV of the Constitution of Georgia of 1976, and the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. A constitutional attack on a criminal statute of this state cannot be raised for the first time in a motion for new trial. Corbin v. State, 212 Ga. 231, 233(7a), 91 S.E.2d 764 (1956). See also Thrall v. State, 226 Ga. 308, 174 S.E.2d 925 (1970).

Irrespective of the procedural deficiencies in appellant's case, the statute in question does not violate the cited constitutional provisions for any of the reasons argued. Knight v. State, 243 Ga. 770, 257 S.E.2d 182 (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 5, 2012
    ...based on the Eighth Amendment, are untimelyif they are presented for the first time in a motion for new trial. Gunn v. State, 244 Ga. 51(2), 257 S.E.2d 538 (1979); Gainey v. State, 232 Ga. 334, 206 S.E.2d 474 (1974) (over Justice Gunter's dissent); Gore v. State, 162 Ga. 267, 276(11), 134 S......
  • Brinkley v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 18, 2012
    ...basis for Supreme Court jurisdiction. See, e.g., Kolokouris v. State, 271 Ga. 597, 597–598, 523 S.E.2d 311 (1999); Gunn v. State, 244 Ga. 51, 52, 257 S.E.2d 538 (1979). However, in contradiction to the many jurisdictional decisions cited above, “in those cases, ‘we did not rule on this Cour......
  • State v. Perkins, 5990-2
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • May 2, 1985
    ...including robbery); Ga.Code § 16-8-41 (1984) (statute denying release from confinement for conviction of armed robbery); Gunn v. State, 244 Ga. 51, 257 S.E.2d 538 (1979) (this statute, as formerly codified, held constitutional as not cruel or unusual); Kan.Stat.Ann. §§ 21-4618 (1981); 22-37......
  • Cunningham v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 13, 1981
    ...being ample evidence presented in the trial court to support its determination, it will not be disturbed on appeal." Gunn v. State, 244 Ga. 51, 257 S.E.2d 538 (1979). On January 2, 1979, the defendant gave North Carolina authorities a complete confession after he was advised of his rights a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT