Gynecology Clinic, Inc. v. Cloer
| Decision Date | 15 March 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 24920.,24920. |
| Citation | 334 S.C. 555,514 S.E.2d 592 |
| Parties | The GYNECOLOGY CLINIC, INC., d/b/a Palmetto State Medical Center, Respondent, v. Pastor Michael CLOER and Pastors for Life, Inc., Appellants. |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Terry Haskins, of Greenville; and James Matthew Henderson, Sr., of The American Center for Law and Justice, of Washington, DC, for appellants.
Suzanne E. Coe, of Law Office of Suzanne E. Coe, of Greenville, for respondent.
This is an appeal from an order finding appellants engaged in a civil conspiracy, and enjoining their picketing activities directed towards respondent, an abortion services provider. We affirm.
Appellants first assert that, because their actions are protected by the First Amendment, they cannot be the basis for a civil conspiracy. Under South Carolina law, "lawful acts may become actionable as a civil conspiracy when the `object is to ruin or damage the business of another.'" LaMotte v. Punch Line of Columbia, Inc., 296 S.C. 66, 370 S.E.2d 711 (1988). The record is replete with evidence that appellants' goal is to discourage women from patronizing respondent's business with the goal of making abortion unavailable. Assuming appellants' acts were lawful, that fact does not prevent the finding of a civil conspiracy. LaMotte v. Punch Line of Columbia, Inc., supra.
Appellants next contend that respondent did not prove a conspiracy because respondent did not show special damages. An action for civil conspiracy is an action at law, and the trial judge's findings will be upheld on appeal unless they are without evidentiary support. Future Group II v. Nationsbank, 324 S.C. 89, 478 S.E.2d 45 (1996). In a conspiracy action, what is required is proof of the fact of damages, not certainty of amount. Charles v. Texas Co., 199 S.C. 156, 18 S.E.2d 719 (1942). "The elements which go to make up such damages must depend on the nature of the act and the injury." Id. Appellants' own literature, which claims to have damaged respondent by causing a dramatic drop in the number of abortions performed at the clinic, is itself evidence of damages. We affirm the trial judge's damages findings. Future Group II v. Nationsbank, supra.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pye v. Estate of Fox
...action at law; the trial judge's findings will be upheld on appeal unless they are without evidentiary support. Gynecology Clinic v. Cloer, 334 S.C. 555, 514 S.E.2d 592 (1999). Peoples Federal, 358 S.C. at 470, 596 S.E.2d at The gravamen of the tort of civil conspiracy is the damage resulti......
-
Angus v. Burroughs & Chapin Co.
...members and REVERSED as to the remaining respondents.7 HUFF, J., and CURETON, A.J., concur. 1. In Gynecology Clinic, Inc. v. Cloer, 334 S.C. 555, 556, 514 S.E.2d 592, 593 (1999), our supreme court clarified that "[i]n a conspiracy action, what is required is proof of the fact of damages, no......
-
PEOPLES FEDERAL SAVINGS v. Resources
...action at law; the trial judge's findings will be upheld on appeal unless they are without evidentiary support. Gynecology Clinic v. Cloer, 334 S.C. 555, 514 S.E.2d 592 (1999). In relevant part, the 1988 Amendments provide: Sale of Undeveloped Parcel: In the event the Developer sells an und......
-
Integrity Worldwide, Inc. v. Int'l Safety Access Corp.
...to a jury trial on Counts one, two, and five. Plaintiffs' claim for civil conspiracy is legal in nature. Gynecology Clinic, Inc. v. Cloer, 514 S.E.2d 592, 592 (S.C. 1999) ("An action for civil conspiracy is an action at law[.]"). As such, Plaintiffs are entitled to a jury trial on their cla......