H. O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton V. Phillips Co.

Decision Date01 July 1971
Docket NumberNo. 41610,41610
Citation79 Wn.2d 431,486 P.2d 1071
PartiesH. O. MEYER DRILLING CO., Inc., a Washington corporation, Respondent, v. ALTON V. PHILLIPS CO., Inc., A Washington corporation, and United Pacific Insurance Company, a Washington corporation, Petitioners.
CourtWashington Supreme Court

Lycette, Diamond & Sylvester, John N. Sylvester, Seattle, for petitioners.

Johnson, Jonson & Inslee, Carl A. Jonson, Seattle, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In this cause we granted a petition to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, as reported in 2 Wash.App. 600, 468 P.2d 1008 (1970).

Our decision in Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co., Wash., 486 P.2d 1080 (1971), contemporaneously filed, involves and affirmatively resolves the basic question presented in this action, I.e., whether a contractor's substantial compliance with the registration requirements of RCW 18.27 (the contractors registration act) satisfies the policy of that statute. The essential facts in the instant case, as well as the determination of the Court of Appeals, are in accord with the Murphy case. Disposition of this cause is, therefore, controlled by Murphy.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

STAFFORD, Associate Justice (dissenting).

The reasons for my dissent have been set forth at length in Murphy v. Campbell Investment Co., Wash., 486 P.2d 1080 (1971). Nothing will be gained by repeating them in the instant case.

ROSELLINI, J., concurs.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Todisco v. Econopouly
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 6, 1989
    ...136 Cal.App.3d 679, 186 Cal.Rptr. 421; H.O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton V. Phillips Co., 2 Wash.App. 600, 468 P.2d 1008, affd 79 Wash.2d 431, 486 P.2d 1071 [contractor licensed before and after work was performed]. In New York we have a substantial body of law dealing with suits by unlicens......
  • State Dept. of Transp. v. State Employees' Ins. Bd.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • June 3, 1982
    ...to statutory construction. See, Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton V. Phillips Co., 2 Wash.App. 600, 605, 468 P.2d 1008 (1970), aff'd 79 Wash.2d 431, 486 P.2d 1071 (1971). Such statutory construction may involve a consideration of the legislative history, Shelton Hotel Co. v. Bates, 4 Wash.2d 498,......
  • Expert Drywall, Inc. v. Brain
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • May 9, 1977
    ...of compensation for performance of work or for breach of contract. RCW 18.27.080. See also H. O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton V. Phillips Co., 79 Wash.2d 431, 486 P.2d 1071 (1971); Murphy v. Campbell Inv. Co., 79 Wash.2d 417, 486 P.2d 1080 (1971). It was pointed out in Jeanneret v. Rees, 82 ......
  • Martinson v. Publishers Forest Products Co., 1825--I
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • April 22, 1974
    ...of compensation for performance of work or for breach of contract. RCW 18.27.080. See also H. O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton V. Phillips Co., 79 Wash.2d 431, 486 P.2d 1071 (1971); Murphy v. Campbell Inv. Co., 79 Wash.2d 417, 486 P.2d 1080 (1971). It was pointed out in Jeanneret v. Rees, 82 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT