Hager v. Adams
Decision Date | 29 October 1886 |
Citation | 30 N.W. 36,70 Iowa 746 |
Parties | HAGER v. ADAMS. PECKHAM v. WILSON. LEONARD v. BERRY. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeals from the circuit court of Linn county.
These actions are submitted together as involving the same questions of law. They are actions in equity brought to enjoin the defendants from prosecuting proceedings in garnishment in Minnesota, and decree was rendered for the plaintiffs. The cases all come to us upon certificates of appeal as involving less than $100. For a proper understanding of the cases it will be sufficient to set out the certificate in the case first above named. That certificate is in these words: The court below having virtually held the affirmative of these questions, and rendered a decree accordingly, the defendants appeal.Geo. W. Wilson and Rickel & Bull, for appellants.
A. D. Collier and Smith & Powell, for appellees.
The questions involved were substantially the same as in Teager v. Landsley, 27 N. W. Rep. 739. It is true that in that case there had been a garnishment in Iowa, and the exemption had been pleaded, and the garnishee discharged. In the cases at bar it does not appear that there had been any garnishment in Iowa. But the decision in the case above cited was not made to turn upon such fact. The adjudication in Iowa shown in that case merely established the fact of exemption in Iowa, and that fact in the cases at bar is not disputed. Following that case, we have to say that we see no error. We ought, perhaps, to add that the certificate above set out is not in the form which the appellants desired, and is not, as they claim, correct. But the court was not bound to give any certificate at all. The appellants cannot,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte France
...50 Cal. 293;Gen. Custer Min. Co. v. Van Camp, 2 Idaho, 40, 3 Pac. 22;Paducah v. Ragsdale, 122 Ky. 425, 92 S. W. 13;Hager v. Adams, 70 Iowa, 746, 30 N. W. 36;Snoddy v. Pettis Co., 45 Mo. 361;Hanika v. State, 87 Neb. 845, 128 N. W. 526;Atwood v. Whipple, 48 Ohio, 308, 28 N. E. 674;Wagner v. S......
-
Ex parte France
... ... Co. v. Van Camp (1884), 2 Idaho 40, 3 P. 22; ... City of Paducah v. Ragsdale (1906), 122 Ky ... 425, 92 S.W. 13; Hager v. Adams (1886), 70 ... Iowa 746, 30 N.W. 36; Snoddy v. Pettis ... County (1870), 45 Mo. 361; Hanika v ... State (1910), 87 Neb. 845, ... ...
-
Oates v. Morningside Coll.
...availing in the foreign jurisdiction. As supporting this general doctrine as to the public policy of this state, see Hager v. Adams, 70 Iowa, 746, 30 N. W. 36, and Teager v. Landsley, 69 Iowa, 725, 27 N. W. 739. The case of O'Haire v. Burns, 45 Colo. 432, 101 P. 755, 757, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.......
-
Oates v. Morningside College
...Bank, 70 Vt. 543, 41 A. 1046, 67 Am. St. Rep. 680; Kendall v. McClure Coke Co., 182 Pa. 1, 37 A. 823, 61 Am. St. Rep. 688; Hager v. Adams, 70 Iowa 746, 30 N.W. 36." appearing from the record that the claim now filed in the ancillary estate in South Dakota has already been adjudicated by the......