Hager v. Hager, 0930-85
| Decision Date | 05 November 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 0930-85,0930-85 |
| Citation | 3 Va.App. 415,349 S.E.2d 908 |
| Parties | Landon T. HAGER v. Shirley T. HAGER. Record |
| Court | Virginia Court of Appeals |
Douglas C. Carter, for appellant.
Robert P. Dwoskin, Charlottesville, for appellee.
Present: KOONTZ, C.J., and COLE and HODGES, JJ.
This appeal involves a prayer for a declaration of the validity of the parties' marriage, which will be viewed as a suit to affirm marriage. See Code § 20-90. The trial court held that the marriage was valid and granted appellee leave to proceed with a suit for divorce. The appellant, Landon T. Hager, asserts that the finding of validity was in error. We agree and reverse.
In her bill of complaint filed on the chancery side of the circuit court, the appellee, Shirley T. Hager, alleged that she and the appellant took part in a marriage ceremony in Greenville, South Carolina on July 20, 1958. At the time of the ceremony, appellant had not secured a final decree of divorce from his first wife. He subsequently obtained a final decree of divorce in the Circuit Court of Albemarle County on April 1, 1959. Appellee's complaint alleged that she was unaware that the appellant was married to another woman at the time of her marriage ceremony and that appellant informed her that he was divorced. She prayed that the court declare the parties' marriage valid so that she could proceed with a suit for divorce.
The appellee argues that South Carolina law should apply since the marriage ceremony took place there. She contends that under South Carolina law the parties' marriage is presumptively valid. There is nothing in the record to support her assertion, but even assuming, arguendo, that the assertion is correct, we find that the law of Virginia must be applied to determine the question of validity of the marriage within this state. "[N]o state is bound by comity to give effect in its courts to the marriage laws of another state, repugnant to its own laws and policy." Toler v. Oakwood Smokeless Coal Corp., 173 Va. 425, 430, 4 S.E.2d 364, 366 (1939). In Virginia, a bigamous marriage is void ab initio. "All marriages which are prohibited by law on account of either of the parties having a former wife or husband then living shall be absolutely void." Code § 20-43. Indeed, persons who engage in such a marriage may be subject to criminal prosecution. Code § 18.2-362. Therefore, the South Carolina marriage ceremony "conferred no legal rights, and it was as if no marriage had ever...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Collier v. City of Milford
...policy of the state required to rule on its validity. Catalano v. Catalano, supra, 148 Conn. 291-92, 170 A.2d 726; Hager v. Hager, 3 Va.App. 415, 416, 349 S.E.2d 908 (1986). We are not, however, called upon to decide that question. The commissioner found that it would be "spurious to contem......
-
Bonner v. SYG Assocs., Inc.
...had not ended in death or divorce as of the date of the later marriage. See, e.g. , Va. Code §§ 20-38.1, 20-43 ; Hager v. Hager , 3 Va. App. 415, 416, 349 S.E.2d 908 (1986) ; Grove , 271 F.2d at 919.5 Accordingly, if Decedent's 1993 marriage to de la Vega did not end in divorce as of the da......
- State v. Cook
-
Cole v. Commonwealth of Va..
...is void ab initio ” and yet “persons who engage in such a marriage may be subject to criminal prosecution.” Hager v. Hager, 3 Va.App. 415, 416–17, 349 S.E.2d 908, 909 (1986).B. CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES Cole also raises several constitutional challenges to his bigamy conviction, claiming violat......
-
§ 2.03 Establishing a Valid Marriage
...Bir's Estate, 83 Cal. App.2d 256, 188 P.2d 499 (1948). Mississippi: Miller v. Lucks, 36 So.2d 140 (Miss. 1948). Cf., Hager v. Hager, 3 Va. App. 415, 349 S.E.2d 908 (1986) (forum law applied to determine the validity of marriage in another state; unclear whether parties had any contact with ......
-
The meaning of "general laws": the extent of Congress's power under the Full Faith and Credit Clause and the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act.
...and Credit] clause [that marriages] should be afforded full faith and credit as either Acts or Records"). (53) See, eg., Hager v. Hager, 349 S.E.2d 908, 909 (Va. Ct. App. 1986) (declaring a marriage invalid); 26 C.J.S. Declaratory judgments [sections] 38 (1956) ("The marital status of the p......