Haigh v. White Way Laundry Co.
Decision Date | 18 February 1914 |
Citation | 145 N.W. 473,164 Iowa 143 |
Parties | HAIGH v. WHITE WAY LAUNDRY CO. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from District Court, Scott County; William Theophilus, Judge.
Action to recover damages for personal injury. Defendant pleads settlement. Plaintiff replies alleging fraud in procuring settlement. Demurrer to reply. Demurrer overruled. Defendant appeals. Affirmed.Ralph C. Williamson, of Davenport, for appellant.
Ely & Bush, of Davenport, for appellee.
This is an action to recover damages for a personal injury. The plaintiff claims in her petition that on the 16th day of October, 1911, she was in the employ of the defendant in and about its laundry, and while in the exercise of due care on her part, her hand was caught and burned in an unguarded mangle; that her injuries were caused by, and due to, the negligence of the defendant, in this, that it negligently, and in violation of the statute, maintained a mangle without any guard of any kind thereon, and negligently failed to warn the plaintiff of the danger thereof, and negligently required the plaintiff to work at said mangle while the same was unguarded; that, by reason of the injuries received, she was crippled and disfigured. The defendant, answering, said, among other things, that on the 31st of October, 1911, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a written contract whereby they adjusted and settled any cause of action which the plaintiff had by reason of the matters complained of in her petition; said contract being in words and figures as follows: The plaintiff, replying to this defense, states that the contract of release relied upon by the defendant was obtained by misrepresentation and by mistake as to the material facts of her injury, as follows: The defendant demurred to this reply on the ground that the allegations contained therein do not set out such representations or mistakes as to material facts, which, if proven, avoid the release pleaded by the defendant. This demurrer was overruled, and, from the ruling on the demurrer, the defendant appeals.
This case presents but one question, whether or not the allegations of the reply are sufficient, in and of themselves, to avoid the effect of the release executed by the plaintiff. There has been much discussion of this question in the books, and the line of demarcation is not clearly drawn, and it is sometimes difficult to distinguish the rule which affirms the settlement, and the rule that avoids the settlement, as the same has been applied to the facts in particular cases. Language is intended to convey ideas, to be a vehicle of thought. Its use, however, and the manner of its use, does not always clearly accomplish the purpose for which it was intended. There are, however, some general rules recognized and enforced in matters of this kind, and so well settled that no difficulty arises, in their application to a given state of facts, when the fact conditions are made plain, by the words used in setting them forth. In the pleading before us, there are many statements made, as a basis for avoiding the settlement, which, in and of themselves, do not have the effect contended for them. They are merely expressions of opinion, as to results to be anticipated in the future, from known and recognized conditions. There is no direct allegation that these opinions were not honestly given. There is...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Estes v. MaGee
... ... claim that he did not know it was false at the time he made ... it." Haigh v. White Way Laundry Co. , 164 Iowa ... 143, 145 N.W. 473, 50 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1091.' ... ...
-
Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Nunnery
... ... he asserted it." ... Haigh ... v. White Way Laundry Co., 164 Ia. 143, 145 N.W. 473, 50 L. R ... A. (N. S.) 1091; Jacobson ... ...
-
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Peterson
... ... behind the claim that he did not know it was false at the ... time he made it.' Haigh v. White Way Laundry ... Co., 164 Iowa 143, 50 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1091, 145 N.W ... In ... ...
-
Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company
... ... claim that he did not know it was false at the time he ... asserted it." [132 Minn. 186] Haigh v. White Way ... Laundry Co. 164 Iowa 143, 145 N.W. 473, 50 L.R.A.(N.S.) ... 1091. The rule has ... ...