Hall v. Elrac, Inc.
Decision Date | 10 June 2008 |
Docket Number | 3884. |
Citation | 859 N.Y.S.2d 641,2008 NY Slip Op 05309,52 A.D.3d 262 |
Parties | JAWAUN CRAIG HALL, Appellant, v. ELRAC, INC., Doing Business as ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR, Respondent, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor-Respondent, et al., Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Plaintiff's vicarious liability claims against respondent are barred by 49 USC § 30106, the "Graves Amendment." We reject plaintiff's argument that the Graves Amendment violates the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution ( ). We also reject plaintiff's argument that the Graves Amendment violates equal protection by favoring car rental companies over other vehicle owners, such as taxi owners, repair shop owners who provide loaner vehicles to customers, and car dealerships that allow test drives, who also allow others to operate their vehicles. The renting of vehicles has a clear substantial effect on interstate commerce (Graham, 50 AD3d at 61-62), unlike these other activities, and the same rational basis for regulating the renting of vehicles under the Commerce Clause even in purely intrastate instances—that elimination of vicarious liability will result in a reduction of insurance costs that will in turn result in a reduction of consumer prices and allow more lessors to remain in business (see id. at 61)—supports the classification for purposes of equal protection. We have considered and rejected plaintiff's other arguments.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ramos v. Keston Brown, Gristede's Foods, Inc.
...liable under Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388 for the negligence of the defendant vehicle operator. See Hall v. Elrac, Inc., 52 A.D.3d 262, 859 N.Y.S.2d 641 (1st Dep't 2008). The Gristede's defendants submit the affidavit of Mark Kassner ("Kassner"), Chief Financial Officer and Vice President ......
-
Marshall v. Barraza
... ... medical findings support the plaintiffs claim'" ... (Spencer v. Golden Eagle, Inc., 82 ... A.D.3d 589, 590 [1st Dept. 2011] [internal quotations ... omitted]). A defendant may ... 2010]). In the ... Appellate Division, First Department matter Hall ... v. Elrac, Inc. the Court found the Graves ... Amendment barred the plaintiffs vicarious ... ...
-
Moreau v. Sydney Josaphat, Zipcar N.Y., Inc.
...that will in turn result in a reduction of consumer prices and allow more lessors to remain in business” (Hall v. Elrac, Inc., 52 A.D.3d 262, 262–263, 859 N.Y.S.2d 641 [2008] ). As such, the court found that the statute did not act to protect defendants from the plaintiff's vicarious liabil......
-
Wallis v. Harrison
...foregoing was sufficient to meet defendant Lease Plan's prima facie burden on the claims of vicarious liability (see Hall v Elrac. Inc., 52 A.D.3d 262 [1st Dept 2008|) and. to the extent such a claim is discernable from the complaint, respondeat superior (see Freihaum v Brady, 143 AD 220 [1......