Hamilton v. State, 82-2241
| Decision Date | 07 September 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-2241,82-2241 |
| Citation | 439 So.2d 238 |
| Parties | Ella Mae HAMILTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Wilbur C. Smith, III, of Smith, Carta, Ringsmuth & Kluttz, Fort Myers, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Bartow, and Diane Barrs, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Having been convicted of a vehicular homicide under section 782.071, Florida Statutes (1981), the appellant presents four points for review on appeal, the most serious of which challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction.
The accident which tragically took the life of a five year old child occurred when the appellant struck the deceased child and a playmate on Hunter's Green Drive in Lee County, Florida. Appellant contends that the evidence presented to the jury was insufficient as a matter of law to establish that degree of recklessness in the operation of a motor vehicle required to sustain a conviction under the aforesaid statute. Section 782.071, Florida Statutes (1981), provides:
Vehicular Homicide.--"Vehicular homicide" is the killing of a human being by the operation of a motor vehicle by another in a reckless manner likely to cause the death of, or great bodily harm to, another. Vehicular homicide is a felony of the third degree....
The evidence presented would have permitted the jury to find that the appellant was operating her vehicle in a residential area upwards of 50 miles per hour to 60 miles per hour and struck two small children playing in the roadway. The appellant testified that she never saw the children either before or after impact and suggested she might have been distracted by a movement of her child in the car. No drinking was involved and no mechanical defects were present in appellant's vehicle.
The oft-repeated statement that excessive speed alone will not support such a conviction is heard once again. There were, however, a number of other factors or circumstances to be considered by the jury, in addition to excessive speed, as we have gleaned them from the record. These factors and circumstances include: (1) that it was a clear, dry day with good visibility; (2) that appellant was traveling on a level two-lane roadway more or less in the middle of the road; (3) that there were no obstructions to her view ahead in the form of parked vehicles, foliage or any other objects; (4) that she...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Santisteban v. State
...hour in a 30 mile per hour zone before the collision and a minimum of 50 miles per hour at the time of impact); Hamilton v. State, 439 So.2d 238, 238–39 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (holding that speed alone will not support a conviction, but that other factors supported the vehicular homicide convic......
-
Luzardo v. State
...of vehicular homicide.” Id. at 1233. The House court supported its reasoning by reference to another of its cases, Hamilton v. State, 439 So.2d 238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). In contrast to House, Hamilton actually affirmed a vehicular homicide verdict arising out of the deaths of two children in ......
-
Lewek v. State
...under these circumstances. See, e.g., McCreary, 371 So.2d at 1024; Byrd v. State, 531 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Hamilton v. State, 439 So.2d 238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Savoia v. State, 389 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Because the admissible evidence shows the Defendant killed two people......
-
Werhan v. State
...overcorrected, and caused fatal collision in oncoming driver's lane, was not guilty of vehicular homicide). But see Hamilton v. State, 439 So.2d 238 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Because appellant was proven guilty of gross negligence, the conviction for vehicular homicide must stand. But appellant i......
-
Tragedy behind the wheel: understanding manslaughter by culpable negligence, vehicular homicide, and DUI manslaughter.
...v. State, 571 So. 2d 113 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1990). [12] Berning v. State, 639 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 1994). [13] "Hamilton v. State, 439 So. 2d 238 (Fla. [14] Fla. Stat. [sections] 316.193(3)3 (1995). [15] Magaw v. State, 537 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 1989); State v. Altamura, 676 So. 2d 29, 30 (......