Hankey v. State, 86-1586
| Decision Date | 23 April 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 86-1586,86-1586 |
| Citation | 505 So.2d 701,12 Fla. L. Weekly 1088 |
| Parties | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1088 Thomas Raymond HANKEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender and James R. Wulchak, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
James A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Ellen D. Phillips, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
Prior report: Fla., 485 So.2d 827; Fla.App., 458 So.2d 1143.
Hankey was resentenced to thirty months incarceration, followed by two years community control, followed by five years probation. He had been convicted of burglary of a dwelling 1 and burglary of a structure. 2 The presumptive guideline sentence based on Hankey's 48 point count was "community control or 12 to 30 months incarceration," the second bracket of the category 5 scoresheet. Because no written reasons for a departure sentence were given, we vacate the sentence.
In this particular bracket it is clear that the presumptive sentence could only be either community control or 12 to 30 months incarceration. If incarceration was imposed, there could be no community control, based on the language of the guidelines. Similarly, the court could not have imposed incarceration time if it elected community control.
Accordingly, Hankey's sentence departed upward from the guidelines presumptive sentence. Since the trial judge failed to give any written reasons for aggravating Hankey's punishment, we must vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985).
VACATE SENTENCE; REMAND.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hankey v. State, 87-1854
...not exceed the term provided by general law. Note that this is also the basis for the holdings in Carr and McKee. In Hankey v. State, 505 So.2d 701 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 515 So.2d 230 (Fla.1987), and in VanKooten v. State, 512 So.2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), this court held that ......
-
Jaggers v. State
...on the victim has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Hankey v. State, 485 So.2d 827, 828 (Fla.1986), appeal after remand, 505 So.2d 701 (Fla.1987). See also State v. Rousseau, 509 So.2d 281 (Fla.1987). Further, we find Thomas v. State, 501 So.2d 752 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), Casteel v. State......
-
Moreno v. State, 87-1930
...475 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), VanKooten v. State, 512 So.2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), approved, 522 So.2d 830 (Fla.1988), Hankey v. State, 505 So.2d 701 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 515 So.2d 230 (Fla.1987), and certify the following question of great public WHEN THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE RAN......
-
Tillman v. State, 88-1954
...reasons. He relies on Vankooten v. State, 512 So.2d 214 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), approved, 522 So.2d 830 (Fla.1988) and Hankey v. State, 505 So.2d 701 (Fla. 5th DCA); review denied, 515 So.2d 230 Such reliance is misplaced. These cases stand for the proposition that a sentence may not include b......