Hannaway v. Cole

Decision Date06 June 1974
Citation311 N.E.2d 924,2 Mass.App.Ct. 847
PartiesPaul H. HANNAWAY v. Edwin M. COLE.
CourtAppeals Court of Massachusetts

Paul H. Hannaway, pro se.

Lionel H. Perlo and Jacob J. Locke, Boston, for defendant.

Before HALE, C.J., and ROSE, KEVILLE, GRANT and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

RESCRIPT.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to an action in tort for malpractice. The grounds stated in the demurrer were that the declaration did not state a cause of action and that it did not state the facts necessary to constitute the cause of action concisely and with substantial certainty. See G.L. c. 231, § 7, Second. The declaration alleged in substance that the plaintiff had related confidential information to the defendant, a psychiatrist, in the course of professional treatment and that the defendant had disclosed that information, causing injury to the plaintiff. Courts in a number of other jurisdictions have held that a doctor has a legal duty not to disclose confidential information related to him in the context of a professional relationship and have recognized a cause of action in tort for damages resulting from such a disclosure. See, e.g., Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 243 F.Supp. 793, 801--802 (N.D.Ohio 1965); Hague v. Williams, 37 N.J. 328, 335--336, 181 A.2d 345 (1962); Felis v. Greenberg, 51 Misc.2d 441, 443, 273 N.Y.S.2d 288 (N.Y.Supr.Ct.1966). Although this question has never been decided in Massachusetts, there appears to be a development toward recognition of the validity of a patient's interest in confidentiality (see G.L. c. 233, § 23B, added by St.1958, c. 256; G.L. c. 233, § 20B, added by St.1968, c. 418) and the potential civil liability of a doctor for a breach thereof (see G.L. c. 112, § 12G, added by St.1971, c. 335, § 2). Even if such an action could be brought in this Commonwealth, we are of the opinion that the present declaration is deficient in that it does not set forth the circumstances of the alleged disclosure or the identity of the person or persons to whom it was made. These omissions are of sufficient gravity so as to prevent the defendant from pleading to the declaration intelligenty and with directness. See Grandchamp v. Costello, 289 Mass. 506, 507, 194 N.E. 837 (1935); Webber v. Johnson, 342 Mass. 455, 459, 174 N.E.2d 40 (1961). The order sustaining the demurrer is affirmed and judgment is to be entered for the defendant.

So ordered.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Bratt v. International Business Machines Corp.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • 16 Julio 1984
    ...a patient's valid interest in preserving the confidentiality of medical facts relayed to a physician. 21 See Hannaway v. Cole, 2 Mass.App.Ct. 847, 848, 311 N.E.2d 924 (1974). 22 "A patient should be entitled to freely disclose his symptoms and condition to his doctor in order to receive pro......
  • Logan v. District of Columbia
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • 27 Marzo 1978
    ...441, 443, 273 N.Y.S.2d 288, 290 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1966); Berry v. Moench, 8 Utah 2d 191, 331 P.2d 814, 817 (1958); cf. Hannaway v. Cole, 2 Mass.App. 847, 311 N.E.2d 924, 925 (1974) (dicta); Wenninger v. Muesing, 307 Minn. 405, 240 N.W.2d 333, 337 (1976) (dicta); Alexander v. Knight, 197 Pa.Super.......
  • Allen v. Smith
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • 21 Abril 1988
    ...291 Ala. 701, 287 So.2d 824 (1973); Vassiliades v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros., 492 A.2d 580 (Dist.Ct.App.1985); Hannaway v. Cole, 2 Mass.App. 847, 311 N.E.2d 924 (1974); Stempler v. Speidell, 100 N.J. 368, 495 A.2d 857 (1985); MacDonald v. Clinger, 84 A.D.2d 482, 446 N.Y.2d 801 (1982); Alex......
  • Ross v. Ross
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • 8 Agosto 1974
    ...N.E.2d 141 (1968). Turner v. Guy, --- Mass.App. ---, ---, c 311 N.E.2d 921 (1974). Figueiredo v. Silvia, --- Mass.App. ---, ---, d 311 N.E.2d 924 (1974). We summarize the facts as found by the judge and by us. The parties were married in 1950 in California where the defendant was attending ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT