Hanover Square Antiques, Ltd. v. Insalaco, 5666.
Decision Date | 22 March 2005 |
Docket Number | 5666. |
Citation | 791 N.Y.S.2d 545,2005 NY Slip Op 02316,16 A.D.3d 258 |
Parties | HANOVER SQUARE ANTIQUES, LTD., Doing Business as HANOVER SQUARE GALLERY, Appellant, v. DENNIS R. INSALACO et al., Respondents. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
The claims for breach of warranty and fraud were untimely (UCC 2-725 [1]), since plaintiff commenced this action more than four years after the sale of the painting, when the causes accrued. Moreover, the contract did not fall within the future performance exception of UCC 2-725 (2), since there was no express warranty of future performance in the invoice of sale (Rosen v Spanierman, 894 F2d 28 [2d Cir 1990]).
To continue reading
Request your trial3 cases
-
Tony Shafrazi Gallery, Inc. v. Christie's Inc.
...of warranty cause of action on statute of limitations grounds, the motion court correctly relied on Hanover Square Antiques Limited v. Insalaco, 16 A.D.3d 258, 791 N.Y.S.2d 545 [2005]lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 710, 804 N.Y.S.2d 34, 837 N.E.2d 733 [2005].MAZZARELLI, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, DeGRASSE, MANZA......
- People v. Lopez
- Hanover Square Antiques, Ltd. v. Insalaco