People v. Lopez

Decision Date22 March 2005
Docket Number5669.
Citation2005 NY Slip Op 02317,16 A.D.3d 258,791 N.Y.S.2d 111
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SANDRO LOPEZ, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal encompassed his excessive sentence claim and thus forecloses interest of justice review (People v Seaberg,74 NY2d 1, 9-10[1989]).In any event, were we to find that defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal, we would...

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
3 cases
  • People v. Lopez
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 16 Febrero 2006
    ...find that defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal, we would perceive no basis for reducing the sentence" (16 A.D.3d 258, 258, 791 N.Y.S.2d 111 [1st Dept.2005] [citation omitted]). On defendant's appeal of the excessive sentence issue, we now affirm the Appellate Division's Peopl......
  • People v. Lopez
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 3 Mayo 2005
    ...N.E.2d 978 4 N.Y.3d 888 PEOPLE v. LOPEZ (SANDRO) Court of Appeals of the State of New York May 3, 2005. Appeal from 1st Dept.: 16 A.D.3d 258, 791 N.Y.S.2d 111 Application for leave to appeal—criminal. Granted. (Rosenblatt, J.) ...
  • Hanover Square Antiques, Ltd. v. Insalaco
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 22 Marzo 2005

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT