Harden v. State
| Decision Date | 07 June 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. S04A0777.,S04A0777. |
| Citation | 597 S.E.2d 380,278 Ga. 40 |
| Parties | HARDEN v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Randolph Frails, Augusta, for appellant.
Daniel J. Craig, Dist. Atty., Charles R. Sheppard, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Frank M. Gaither, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Defendant Judson Harden was convicted of two counts of felony murder, armed robbery, and two counts of possession of a firearm in the commission of a crime.1 On appeal, he enumerates error upon the sufficiency of the evidence and the effectiveness of trial counsel. Finding no error, we affirm.
The victims, James and Lisa Stone, met with Reginald Smith to purchase crack cocaine, and the trio drove to an area where defendant and others were purportedly selling drugs. James was behind the steering wheel, Lisa was in the passenger seat, and Smith was in the back seat. As they approached defendant and the others, James asked if they had any drugs. Christopher Cummings stood on the driver's side of the vehicle and handed James a package. Defendant positioned himself on the passenger side of the vehicle. James said, "This isn't real." James and Cummings argued over the purity of the product. Cummings displayed a rifle; defendant brandished a handgun and took $20 from the Stones. Cummings then fired his rifle one time; defendant fired his handgun five or six times, hitting James and Lisa. James died at the scene; Lisa died several days later.
1. The evidence was sufficient to enable any rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes for which he was convicted. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). It cannot be said that the evidence was insufficient simply because one eyewitness, an accomplice, testified pursuant to a negotiated plea; or that the identification testimony of another eyewitness, Reginald Smith, was "suspect." The testimony and credibility of the witnesses were matters solely within the province of the jury. Jaxo v. State, 272 Ga. 355(1), 528 S.E.2d 807 (2000).
2. Trial counsel moved for a new trial, asserting the general grounds. Although he was replaced prior to the hearing by appellate counsel, the motion for new trial was not amended to assert a claim of ineffective assistance. Moreover, at the hearing upon the motion, appellate counsel argued only the sufficiency of the evidence; he presented no evidence whatsoever as to the effectiveness of trial counsel. It follows that appellate counsel did not assert a claim of ineffective counsel at the earliest practicable moment and that that claim is procedurally barred. Ponder v....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ruiz v. State
...can be heard at the earliest practicable moment, i.e., during the hearing on the amended motion."). See also Harden v. State, 278 Ga. 40(2), 597 S.E.2d 380 (2004). Under the circumstances, the only means by which Ruiz may pursue a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel is in a hab......
-
Handley v. the State.
...testified pursuant to a grant of immunity or because some of the witnesses were initially suspects themselves. See Harden v. State, 278 Ga. 40, 41(1), 597 S.E.2d 380 (2004). “ ‘ “It was for the jury to determine the credibility of the witnesses and to resolve any conflicts or inconsistencie......
-
Hardy v. United States, 14-388L
... ... company notifies the STB that it has fully abandoned the line, the STB is divested of jurisdiction over the abandoned railroad line and "state law reversionary property interests, if any, take effect." Caldwell v. United States , 391 F.3d 1226, 1228-29 (Fed. Cir. 2004). B. The Initial ... ...
-
Winters v. State
...v. State, 279 Ga. 721, 721, 620 S.E.2d 828 (2005) ; Harris v. State, 279 Ga. 304, 306 (2), 612 S.E.2d 789 (2005) ; Harden v. State, 278 Ga. 40, 41 (1), 597 S.E.2d 380 (2004). We must view the facts in the light most favorable to the verdict. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. ......