Hardin v. Jefferson County

Decision Date14 February 1941
Docket Number36861
Citation147 S.W.2d 643,347 Mo. 410
PartiesC. M. Hardin v. Jefferson County, Appellant
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Francois Circuit Court; Hon. Taylor Smith Judge.

Reversed.

W Oliver Rasch and Edgar & Matthes for appellant.

(1) This court will take judicial notice of the actual population of Jefferson County, Missouri, as based on the decennial census of 1930 which according to Official Manual of Missouri 1931-1932, page 180, was 27,563. State ex rel. Moseley v Lee, 5 S.W.2d 91; State ex rel. v. Roach, 258 Mo. 541, 167 S.W. 1008; Heather v. Palmyra, 276 S.W. 875. (2) Under the provisions of Section 7892, Revised Statutes 1929, a board of road overseers could not have existed legally in Jefferson County, for 1931, because Jefferson County did not have a population of at least 50,000 for said year but had a population, according to Official Manual of Missouri, 1931-1932, page 180, of 27,563. (3) In determining the population of Jefferson County, in 1931, and for purpose of this case, the decennial census of 1930 governed, and the provisions of Section 11808, Revised Statutes 1929, did not apply. State ex rel. Moseley v. Lee, 5 S.W.2d 91. (a) The provisions of Section 11808 applied only to offices already created and existing and could not be used for purpose of creating an office, which is the effect of judgment rendered by trial court. (4) There were only three counties in Missouri which had a population of not less than 50,000 and not more than 200,000 without a city of first class in 1931, based on decennial census of 1930, Official Manual of Missouri 1931-1932, and therefore only said counties could legally have a board of road overseers under provisions of Section 7892, Revised Statutes 1929. State ex rel. Moseley v. Lee, 5 S.W.2d 91. (5) The statutes applicable to this case, clearly contemplate that the county court of a county that could legally have a board of road overseers, must organize as such board during term of office of the county judges; and shall as members of said board, see that roads are kept in good repair; and that the county judges shall set aside a sum to take care of salary of board members, which must be paid in monthly installments; and also contemplate that the county clerk shall keep accurate and complete record of proceedings of board. Secs. 7892, 7895, 9874, R. S. 1929. (6) When a cause is submitted and tried on an agreed statement of facts, the rule that Supreme Court cannot weigh evidence, if fact findings of court are supported by any evidence, is inapplicable. City of Stanberry v. Jordan, 145 Mo. 371; Jewel Tea Co. v. Carthage, 165 S.W. 743; Ransford v. Natl. Protective Ins. Assn., 16 S.W.2d 663; Bartlett v. Natl. Finance Corp., 73 S.W.2d 451.

Sam McKay and Smith & Roberts for respondent.

(1) The County Court of Jefferson County, Missouri, in the year 1931, constituted a board of road Overseers. Sec. 7892, R. S. 1929; State ex rel. Mosley v. Lee, 5 S.W.2d 83. (2) A county judge who is a member of the board of road overseers, under Section 7892, Revised Statutes 1929, is a county officer. 20 C. J. S., p. 888; Hastings v. Jasper County, 282 S.W. 700; State ex rel. Buchanan County v. Imel, 146 S.W. 783; 15 C. J. 481. (3) The population of Jefferson County, Missouri, for the purpose of determining salaries of county officers was in excess of 50,000 and less than 200,000. Sec. 11808, R. S. 1929; State ex rel. Summers v. Hamilton, 278 S.W. 37; Hastings v. Jasper County, 282 S.W. 701; State v. Hoffman, 294 S.W. 431.

OPINION

Gantt, P. J.

Action originating in the Jefferson County Court. Plaintiff, as a judge of that court, claimed that the county owed him $ 1200 salary as member of a Board of Road Overseers of the county for the year 1931. The judges of that court being interested, the cause was certified to the circuit court under Section 2079, Revised Statutes 1929. In that court plaintiff had judgment for $ 1200. Defendant county appealed.

The question for determination is whether or not the judges of that county in 1931 constituted a Board of Road Overseers under Section 7892, Revised Statutes 1929. To be so constituted, the county, among other requirements, must "have a population of not less than fifty thousand nor more than two hundred thousand inhabitants."

The Legislature provided no special statutory method to determine the population of a county under Section 7892. Absent such a method, the question of population is fixed by the last decennial census, which is the census of 1930. [Sec. 654, R S. 1929; State ex inf. v. Evans, 166 Mo. 347, 355, 66 S.W. 355; State ex rel. Moseley et al. v. Lee et al., 319 Mo. 976, 5 S.W.2d 83, 91.] Under said census the population of Jefferson County was 27,563 in 1931. (Official Manual of Missouri for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Reals v. Courson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 28, 1942
    ... ... Louis County, Missouri, Appellants No. 37992Supreme Court of MissouriJuly 28, 1942 ...           ... on the census of 1940. Wiles v. Williams, 232 Mo ... 68, 133 S.W. 1; Hardin v. Jefferson County, 147 ... S.W.2d 643. (d) The exclusion of certain counties having ... similar ... ...
  • Rhodus v. Geatley
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 14, 1941
    ... ... in fee in certain lands situated in Franklin County and that ... the defendant is tenant thereof per autre vie ; that ... the defendant claims the ... ...
  • Barbourville v. Knox Co. Fiscal Court
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • June 29, 2001
    ...106 La. 541, 31 So. 62, 63 (1901); see also Ryan v. Mayor of City of Tuscaloosa, 155 Ala. 479, 46 So. 638, 641 (1908). 14. 347 Mo. 410, 147 S.W.2d 643 (1941) 15. Id. at 644. 16. See also Union Elec. Co. v. Cuivre River Elec. Coop., 571 S.W.2d 790 (Mo.Ct.App. 1978) citing Reals v. Courson, 3......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT