Harper v. State, 47543
| Citation | 127 Ga.App. 359,193 S.E.2d 259 |
| Decision Date | 18 October 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 47543,No. 2,47543,2 |
| Parties | W. J. HARPER v. The STATE |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Patton & Flinn, C. Ronald Patton, Rome, for appellant.
F. Larry Salmon, Dist. Atty., Rome, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Defendant appeals from his conviction for aggravated assault. It appears that defendant's mother-in-law overheard an altercation between the defendant and her daughter and determined to take action. She entered their bedroom, hit defendant over the head with a spray can and forcibly ejected him into the back yard. Unfortunately defendant had a pistol, so, holding him at bay with a barrage of rocks, she called for reinforcements. One of her sons appeared on the scene with a gun. Defendant fired three times. The first shot killed the brother-in-law. The next two are alleged as the aggravated assault upon the mother-in-law (who was still hurling rocks). Defendant testified under oath that he was shooting into the air to warn her off and that he was so close he could have hit her if he had intended to. She testified that he was pointing the pistol at her. Defendant was acquitted on the homicide charge but convicted for the assault.
1. The evidence supports the verdict. There is no reversible inconsistency between the two verdicts. The jury would have been authorized to find that the shooting of the brother-in-law was justified because he was armed, but that the mother-in-law's rocks did not pose such a threat of death or great injury to justify the defendant's use of a deadly weapon against her. See Code Ann. § 26-902.
2. Defendant contends the court erred in refusing to allow testimony concerning previous assaults made by the mother-in-law upon the defendant and other persons to show her character for violence and turbulence. This same issue was decided adversely in Crawford v. State, 124 Ga.App. 469, 184 S.E.2d 361.
3. Defendant also contends the court erred by instructing the jury that it could not convict for simple assault. He contends that simple assault is a lesser included offense of aggravated assault and that there was evidence the jury could have believed showing he did not have the more culpable mental state (intent to murder) required for the greater offense. He has overlooked, however, the fact that an assault becomes aggravated in two ways: when there is an intent to murder (or rape or rob) or when it is made with a deadly weapon,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bryant v. State
...See Riddle v. State, 145 Ga.App. 328, 330(1), 243 S.E.2d 607; Grant v. State, 136 Ga.App. 351(1), 221 S.E.2d 210; Harper v. State, 127 Ga.App. 359, 360(3), 193 S.E.2d 259. Clearly, the court charged after instructing on the meaning of assault, that the assault becomes aggravated if committe......
-
Bruce v. State
...there is an intent to murder, to rape, or to rob. Code Ann. § 26-1302 (Ga.L.1968, pp. 1249, 1280; 1976, p. 543); Harper v. State, 127 Ga.App. 359(3), 193 S.E.2d 259 (1972). Since there was some evidence of intent to rape, if not to rob, the conviction of aggravated assault would not be inco......
-
Craft v. State
...an aggravated assault upon a police officer. See Code Ann. § 26-1302 (Ga.L.1968, pp. 1249, 1280; 1976, p. 543), and Harper v. State, 127 Ga.App. 359, 360(3), 193 S.E.2d 259. Compare the recent case of Bundren v. State, 247 Ga. 180, 274 S.E.2d 455 (1981), reversing Id. 155 Ga.App. 265, 270 S......
-
Zachery v. State
...not a "lesser included offense." Code Ann. § 26-1302; Hightower v. State, 137 Ga.App. 790, 791(6), 224 S.E.2d 842; Harper v. State, 127 Ga.App. 359, 360(3), 193 S.E.2d 259. 4. Finally, we do not find that the appellant was denied his right to a thorough and sifting cross examination. The tr......