Hayes v. State, 57246
| Decision Date | 26 November 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 57246,57246 |
| Citation | 50 A.D.2d 693,376 N.Y.S.2d 647 |
| Parties | Richard C. HAYES, as Committee of the person and Property of Thomas F. Hayes, an Incompetent, Respondent, v. STATE of New York et al., Appellants. Claim |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. (Jeremiah Jochnowitz, Albany, of counsel), for appellants.
Weingrad & Weingrad, New York City (Samuel Weingrad, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before HERLIHY, P.J., and GREENBLOTT, KOREMAN, MAIN and REYNOLDS, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of claimant, entered February 6, 1975, upon a decision of the Court of Claims.
The facts out of which this action arose are fully set forth in the decision of the court below wherein claimant was awarded the total sum of $5,526.64, of which the sum of $5,000 was awarded as punitive damages. (80 Misc.2d 498, 363 N.Y.S.2d 986.)
The State contends on this appeal that, since neither the incompetent, the claimant, nor the hospital employee testified, the only evidence tending to prove the alleged assault by the employee upon the inmate were hospital and personnel records which are hearsay and were, thus, not admissible on the trial. In any event, the State argues that the court below improperly awarded punitive damages against it, since such damages may not be awarded against the State and, further, that the facts as alleged would not warrant the imposition of punitive damages.
The evidence received by the court over objection consisted of oral testimony of witnesses relating to what the claimant patient said to them regarding an assault upon him by an employee of defendant hospital. Objection was also made to the receipt in evidence of written reports in the hospital record which reflected the investigations of the incident and the statements made by the claimant as to the alleged occurrence. The court below received such evidence as proof of the facts of the alleged assault on the stated ground that the entries in the hospital records were the only truly accurate reflection of the events in question, and that they were records kept in the regular course of business. We do not agree.
A statement embodied in a record or report may be admitted, pursuant to subdivision (a) of CPLR 4518, as proof of the facts recorded therein if the informant was under a business duty to perceive the event and to transmit information concerning it to an entrant who was under a business duty to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Duverney v. State
...See the cases cited in Hayes v. State of New York, 80 Misc.2d 498, 503, 363 N.Y.S.2d 986, 991, Et seq., revd. on other grounds, 50 A.D.2d 693, 376 N.Y.S.2d 647, affd. 40 N.Y.2d 1044, 392 N.Y.S.2d 282, 36 N.E.2d 956. There appears to be no distinct statement on the issue and it is usually de......
-
Katt v. City of New York
...80 Misc.2d 498, 363 N.Y.S.2d 986, 994 (N.Y.Ct.Cl.1975) (construing Court of Claims Act § 8), rev'd on other grounds, 50 A.D.2d 693, 376 N.Y.S.2d 647 (3d Dep't 1975).17 Nevertheless, New York's highest court rejected that reading, and insisted that a more specific statement than what the leg......
-
Perfetto v. Hoke, 94-CV-4177 (JS)
...123 A.D.2d 457, 506 N.Y.S.2d 760, 761 (1986); Murray v. Donlan, 77 A.D.2d 337, 433 N.Y.S.2d 184, 190 (1980); Hayes v. State, 50 A.D.2d 693, 376 N.Y.S.2d 647, 648 (3d Dep't.1975); see also Weinstein et al., 5 New York Civil Practice § 4518.02 (Bender Under Johnson's definition of `a writing ......
-
McAllister v. South Coast Air Quality etc. Dist.
...Plaintiff points out that the New York Court of Claims stated in Hayes v. State (1975) 80 Misc.2d 498, 363 N.Y.S.2d 986, rev'd 50 A.D.2d 693, 376 N.Y.S.2d 647, aff'd 392 N.Y.S.2d 282, 40 N.Y.2d 1044, 360 N.E.2d 959, that no language in the state Constitution or in section 8 of the New York ......