Healey v. State, s. 89-01305

Decision Date02 February 1990
Docket Number89-01315,Nos. 89-01305,s. 89-01305
Citation556 So.2d 488
Parties15 Fla. L. Weekly D318 Charles HEALEY and Dwight Alan Fulbright, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Allen R. Smith, Winter Haven, for appellants.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Elaine L. Thompson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Charles Healey and Dwight Fulbright were convicted by a jury of armed robbery and aggravated battery. The same attorney represented both appellants at a single trial. On appeal Healey and Fulbright argue that this multiple representation, plus trial counsel's alleged failure to present an available defense of "voluntary intoxication," constitute a prima facie showing of constitutionally inadequate representation. We disagree. As a general rule this sort of claim is inappropriate for direct appellate review, because it often involves collateral questions of fact which cannot be determined solely on the basis of the trial record. Cumper v. State, 506 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The present case poses no exception.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellants to seek further relief in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Tarawneh v. State, 88-2191
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 16, 1990
    ...See Fasano v. State, 548 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Morgan v. State, 550 So.2d 151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). But see Healey v. State, 556 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). They maintain that their theories of defense were mutually antagonistic because Ghada claimed that she was acting out of fea......
  • Loren v. State, 91-1600
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 5, 1992
    ...relief. Kelley v. State, 486 So.2d 578, 585 (Fla.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 871, 107 S.Ct. 244, 93 L.Ed.2d 169 (1986); Healey v. State, 556 So.2d 488 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Cumper v. State, 506 So.2d 89 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The reasons for this rule are because the trial court never had the oppo......
  • Johnson v. State, 2D04-4928.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 6, 2006
    ...a strategic one. This is a factual question that cannot be determined solely on the basis of the trial record. See Healey v. State, 556 So.2d 488, 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Thus, we affirm on this issue. Johnson may raise this claim in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. See Ha......
  • Curtis v. State, 98-02857
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 20, 1998
    ...in unusual circumstances, may not be raised on direct appeal. See Kelley v. State, 486 So.2d 578, 585 (Fla.1986); Healey v. State, 556 So.2d 488, 489 (Fla.2d DCA 1990). ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT